IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-04.txt

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Tue, 12 March 2013 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A51121F84A1 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.808
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zPbTmOWacF-C for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76E021F8675 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (dhcp-2430.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.36.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAC698A036 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:55:50 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:55:39 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20130312145539.GB39238@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <20130311152035.4888.59295.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20130311191607.GF38303@crankycanuck.ca> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303111558310.25246@fledge.watson.org> <20130312133829.GB39133@crankycanuck.ca> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303121006250.27185@fledge.watson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303121006250.27185@fledge.watson.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:56:01 -0000

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:16:46AM -0400, Samuel Weiler wrote:
> 
> My suggestion:  add two sentences to 2.2 explaining the additional
> non-Optional entires in the table in 2.3: RSASHA1 and RSAMD5.
> 
> "RSASHA1 has an implementation status of Must Implement, consistent
> with [RFC4034].  RSAMD5 has an implementation status of Must Not
> Implement because of known weaknesses in MD5."
> 
> Or something like that.

These are good.  Thanks!  I see no reason this can't be added.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email