IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-04.txt

"Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com> Tue, 12 March 2013 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB60B21F8AF4 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hx1yZUESLIQu for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CE621F896E for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=888; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1363100339; x=1364309939; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=6yKXrIhM2IP28jxB32Ess5hTu6JR+AVDWB4cRxcqoNw=; b=b9SbhnBDsD5g8Np34QckfL0bAok0sp8PLv9W/wTnaX9S2Th+Fs2+4cbl VL+8eb476x6+H4/7UY+68ioGyFJaGim/xNUUop18K2QFHc3YLofbFmt0v 27VJbSv1EeKlsr4GscryyjfvpNDme28F5wRMJ++dXe/4MaT7Bt/7wXfQ/ E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4FAOlBP1GtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABDh0y9F4FHFnSCKAEBAQMBAQEBNzQLBQsCAQgOCgoUECcLJQIEDgUIiAYGDLB2j3cTBI5aAjEHgl9hA6dMgwqCKA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,831,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="186566525"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2013 14:58:59 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com [173.36.12.87]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2CEwwGu010083 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:58:58 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.9.127]) by xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com ([173.36.12.87]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:58:58 -0500
From: "Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Thread-Topic: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-04.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOHmwd5pF0LUuL9E+Ad/iyNu0v5pihMLyAgAAP+YCAASQIAIAACrEAgAAK3YCAAADrAA==
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:58:58 +0000
Message-ID: <4518F39EB578034D8C99A9B7776CDBA353913C@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com>
References: <20130311152035.4888.59295.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20130311191607.GF38303@crankycanuck.ca> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303111558310.25246@fledge.watson.org> <20130312133829.GB39133@crankycanuck.ca> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303121006250.27185@fledge.watson.org> <20130312145539.GB39238@mx1.yitter.info>
In-Reply-To: <20130312145539.GB39238@mx1.yitter.info>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.245.134]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1434FF9AE519A944A87E911949FADAB5@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dnsext@ietf.org" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:59:00 -0000

On Mar 12, 2013, at 10:55 AM 3/12/13, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
 wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:16:46AM -0400, Samuel Weiler wrote:
>> 
>> My suggestion:  add two sentences to 2.2 explaining the additional
>> non-Optional entires in the table in 2.3: RSASHA1 and RSAMD5.
>> 
>> "RSASHA1 has an implementation status of Must Implement, consistent
>> with [RFC4034].  RSAMD5 has an implementation status of Must Not
>> Implement because of known weaknesses in MD5."
>> 
>> Or something like that.
> 
> These are good.  Thanks!  I see no reason this can't be added.

I can make this change with an RFC Editor note.

- Ralph

> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> dnsext mailing list
> dnsext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email