Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext)

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Mon, 29 November 2010 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90E728C0F7; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:25:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.568
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.568 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3H1ehL07n8QI; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:25:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72AA628C0F2; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:25:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9A92CC3B; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:26:56 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id usGz262zmMe6; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:26:56 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D9F2CC3A; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:26:55 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4CF40C8E.7020400@piuha.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:26:54 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101027)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
References: <20101123172539.97A9C3A68F5@core3.amsl.com> <p06240830c9199c0a47ed@[10.20.30.150]> <20101129185431.GQ33199@shinkuro.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101129185431.GQ33199@shinkuro.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:30:37 -0800
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] WG Review: Recharter of DNS Extensions (dnsext)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:25:49 -0000

Agreeing with Andrew. Really, if we can't get enough interest to support 
a particular work item then its not worth doing...

I'll also note that if there's interest but the group feels that the 
topic is outside the charter, I think all of us are open to a discussion 
about extending the charter.

Jari