DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com> Tue, 18 October 2005 04:53 UTC
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERjTj-00027m-44 for dnsext-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:53:35 -0400
Received: from psg.com (mailnull@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA02630 for <dnsext-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:53:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1ERjPQ-000LG3-Ti for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:49:08 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0
Received: from [66.92.146.160] (helo=ogud.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1ERjPQ-000LFp-3Z for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:49:08 +0000
Received: from Puki.ogud.com (ns.ogud.com [66.92.146.160]) by ogud.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9I4mupm079495 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:48:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ogud@ogud.com)
Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20051017155946.03fbdd88@localhost>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:48:54 -0400
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
From: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>
Subject: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 66.92.146.160
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
This message starts a 2 week Working Group Last call ending on November 1, for the two following documents: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-06.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-06.txt These two documents replace older RFC's to reflect the fact DSA and Diffie-Hellman keying information is encoded the same way in KEY and DNSKEY RR's (and other DNS RR types). The documents contain few minor textual changes from the RFC's they are replacing, including references to the DNSSEC-bis documents. These documents are on standards track and will be recycled at proposed standard, to be at the same level as DNSSEC-bis. The default action is to advance these documents, if you find any issues with the documents please raise them now. Olafur & Olaf -- to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
- DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Samuel Weiler
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Scott Rose
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Andrew Sullivan
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Mark Andrews
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Eastlake III Donald-LDE008