Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3445 (7836)

"Rose, Scott W. (Fed)" <scott.rose@nist.gov> Mon, 04 March 2024 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.rose@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F8BC14CE2B for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:27:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_GOV_DKIM_AU=-0.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nist.gov
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZjazTc_mZRNS for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:27:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from GCC02-BL0-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl0gcc02on2064.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.89.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47A85C151552 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:27:42 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Ddvh6Cowhf3HD+3qzP+6fBIDcqkTRbzH9zONMsL0cvat2eZOPh3vVcHKaLghefKdh0RknNXtyrW5yMLJ/GOJ4AdGxiAlVE7W1GFlrJXQVqOGxoK6pdWM4sWj8vv+wyzqllGgAG79jpBdeAS44qVS8TOjxtTk2nFphFFjtOXICPb5vsKdtALzgEAoTcqq94lRXtK6IAJS4VOBHnx+7zXdJPueICItGrQWIyjBE8AkCJjOfrSmN3bWr7gb9wf5IZtpVzq7LrXjlk+KQl9i5CWtnMJCKIfpIwimQm5+POHzGK7/G7Ddsv4RlghtLKW3+5EGY1AH1C6DWzNNWfzDv1IAXA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=zKQlqMoj8if1qlQ8vqtmtLfNhMdu6jVz2hfOJNbyjN0=; b=XBpFiSxEA4tB/oE3rGzXGRJjfexpeiudX9sr4Juab9TuIhuDLLNyjp2Y2yISA1bVuF8iRy3mewvwS9Clmd+hR78nrhW71LHhhGy0/1TW8MV/HVMuq/kyCdq8H8J98iUgWZ5RHgdmVX2pHgagnU9nKIsBadXKjNaCLDup12bVoQ3wZ+6syObRvZdgMaZA3zPBk8a5mIiqJU7XovEXO7GZPCLGf7uH3cFzFBWJAbdFuudHD8z/+vIYB1hBgXOn5FFn2xO57cpeEAe9Ys6ifurkluJskWmiDTN5rJ2Un/9KkurMagJw1eX5mW4f+TgLU3nXkpE6Tg/v4hHbZ46TrpCbUA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 129.6.18.29) smtp.rcpttodomain=ietf.org smtp.mailfrom=nist.gov; dmarc=pass (p=reject sp=reject pct=100) action=none header.from=nist.gov; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nist.gov; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=zKQlqMoj8if1qlQ8vqtmtLfNhMdu6jVz2hfOJNbyjN0=; b=sg4m9VA920qFJHaSMJ0/aJAlMYO3ysKqpU04fRggfFSFFzmZnlkl4lA8R41FAlO2CbLVzo8WP+wB0VuVZEeDMs1CjGDqmXAzwZST1B+Bwr3SNy39HCY4aGh451Hwz03aXMVNSej44ztk3wOBW9Mn3ogupNwPgausqo7+w4lYxAMIgQlqyv5yukQre3WJh/GKv/K9xavjTfcbnOT1USY2rmczLPBlL/RJSqkKIvcXWK3R3GBPUCXKH3Tj6LyAs9xFDjWlFX5xF6vJXdEZREDjQRbepWyYxAoysAcG4EO52iktuxc8T16ig0PLg35OCAL4LNj6HOQB06FelqKUbIel9A==
Received: from CY5PR09CA0027.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:930:1::29) by SJ0PR09MB6752.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:266::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7339.39; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:27:38 +0000
Received: from SA2PEPF00002250.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:930:1:cafe::a8) by CY5PR09CA0027.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:930:1::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7339.39 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:27:38 +0000
X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 129.6.18.29) smtp.mailfrom=nist.gov; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nist.gov;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nist.gov designates 129.6.18.29 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=129.6.18.29; helo=smtp1.nist.gov; pr=C
Received: from smtp1.nist.gov (129.6.18.29) by SA2PEPF00002250.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.242.132) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7362.11 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:27:38 +0000
Received: from [129.6.108.95] ([129.6.108.95]) by smtp1.nist.gov with Microsoft SMTPSVC(10.0.14393.4169); Mon, 4 Mar 2024 12:27:37 -0500
From: "Rose, Scott W. (Fed)" <scott.rose@nist.gov>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: masseyd@isi.edu, ek.ietf@gmail.com, evyncke@cisco.com, ogud@ogud.com, ajs@anvilwalrusden.com, mellon@fugue.com, dnsext@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:27:37 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5937)
Message-ID: <911D2B35-FB4C-49E7-A384-BCE2677E1CC0@nist.gov>
In-Reply-To: <20240304161140.0C9921F271B3@rfcpa.amsl.com>
References: <20240304161140.0C9921F271B3@rfcpa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Mar 2024 17:27:37.0283 (UTC) FILETIME=[406C3930:01DA6E59]
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: SA2PEPF00002250:EE_|SJ0PR09MB6752:EE_
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: eb81428e-3c75-41ac-b8fa-08dc3c70637f
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: MrbwZcxbEEmnu6Nu/DiXrW7i/Hzth5xLNgJIERcPI1wjFLZqMekGczLqdtcuQ+Gg452lazrnO8p/ZLGasTdLNh3x/EJ7Ij5L3uyOMzG9CYIiVl69/0eESBCSrOUu7xQ+UIqs1Pemzk4CUhttT/Q31uNaU9y0XImSO67qD6soVG9wh1zH9EVFS+fbcAAsCvPpLTpVAc6PT5JoGNJUBl4sebKBPjVCs6OWZI/lZdz5Qs4DWZR6n1aHd7PE3CVXnF04qoebwjH6nR6V8JxM1VCytnWDnHtT4rjh/FOVLiC5tiC7QkbFQ1BpcJ/XhYWwXC4/zkw4bQMyvIC1nnPK7YQTz1bB9tgAh/8SONVxHRNhkCIhCXpPkTsdEqHm34CHlPVc9qpzSJKfSNb0Mk6+VlYzcJP6pgoZyWJZfvdD+TlXNvGaCLbKnnv9Ad48IU8dWUE4aAHn96SHxlWlrSqzelsAyiO27igCk8Lne6u6w9ttfDryAdTsTeQXXzgs4mDJDsof8XWLlYjKzgeBVUMWI3Le4v02I+hpTYojbvd89EKT+WEJMFNKHSLi+2SYrlV2z1uoA7gjLMKfWz+Aw0fqZ/B4V+wtmwsybyyG0ONW9Ck9gm7vAxw18XfbDEdYEKqcfn3Fyzmb8sRDkPg98vMb8ZNumfqPYEt5asqs0Zsjrrs4iq/b62zNFgBixRCWjW0WYVjNQRWjMGZyNfSjTL36niBzOg==
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:129.6.18.29; CTRY:US; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:CAL; SFV:NSPM; H:smtp1.nist.gov; PTR:smtp1.nist.gov; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230031)(36860700004)(82310400014); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
X-OriginatorOrg: nist.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Mar 2024 17:27:38.2305 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: eb81428e-3c75-41ac-b8fa-08dc3c70637f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 2ab5d82f-d8fa-4797-a93e-054655c61dec
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=2ab5d82f-d8fa-4797-a93e-054655c61dec; Ip=[129.6.18.29]; Helo=[smtp1.nist.gov]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: TreatMessagesAsInternal-SA2PEPF00002250.namprd09.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SJ0PR09MB6752
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/GIaE5ErbmWCP_N59EGPGrW2vEJY>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3445 (7836)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 17:27:53 -0000

I did a quick review of the RFC and the some of the mail posts from DNSSD. I believe the errata is valid.

Scott

On 4 Mar 2024, at 11:11, RFC Errata System wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3445,
> "Limiting the Scope of the KEY Resource Record (RR)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7836
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
>
> Section: GLOBAL
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> Updates: RFC2535
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Updates: RFC2535, RFC2931
>
> Notes
> -----
> This is based on our experience that when writing draft-ietf-dnssd-srp, we had no idea that the KEY RR format was updated, because there was no reference to the updated format in the datatracker page for RFC2931. I think it makes sense to say that 3445 updates 2931, because it does so explicitly.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC3445 (draft-ietf-dnsext-restrict-key-for-dnssec-04)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Limiting the Scope of the KEY Resource Record (RR)
> Publication Date    : December 2002
> Author(s)           : D. Massey, S. Rose
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : DNS Extensions
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG


=====================================
Scott Rose
NIST/CTL/WND
scott.rose@nist.gov
ph: 301-975-8439
GoogleVoice: 571-249-3671
=====================================