Re: [dnsext] An RRTYPE extension language

On Aug 18, 2011, at 2:34 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 02:06:15PM -0400, John R. Levine wrote:
>> I'm happy to do that, but there's not much point if people will just
>> insist that either provisioning isn't a problem, or it's too grubby
>> for DNSEXT to think about.
> 
> Speaking personally, I think it _is_ a problem and I am willing to
> review such a draft.
> 

Coming late to the party, but I too am willing to review and / or contribute...

> Speaking as a co-chair but without having conferred with Olafur, I'm
> not totally sure this is something that would fit correctly in
> DNSEXT's charter, since this is in support of wire changes instead of
> a protocol issue _per se_.  This might actually be DNSOP fodder
> instead.  We can have a jurisdiction fight after there's a draft,
> however.

Yah.

W

> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dnsext mailing list
> dnsext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
> 