IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sury-dnsext-cname-dname-00

Matthew Dempsky <matthew@dempsky.org> Fri, 16 April 2010 07:49 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2E33A6ABA; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.29
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.163, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id duHpt6yF92Ok; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C633A69D1; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1O2gBx-000BGE-HI for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:42:21 +0000
Received: from [209.85.223.175] (helo=mail-iw0-f175.google.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <matthew@dempsky.org>) id 1O2gBv-000BFn-57 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:42:19 +0000
Received: by iwn5 with SMTP id 5so1197450iwn.9 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:42:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.166.212 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:42:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201004160303.o3G33JaD091369@drugs.dv.isc.org>
References: <201004160145.o3G1j6cq090668@drugs.dv.isc.org> <o2sd791b8791004151944g40f2aeedk5140cadc394be44e@mail.gmail.com> <201004160303.o3G33JaD091369@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:42:17 -0700
Received: by 10.231.173.129 with SMTP id p1mr431484ibz.85.1271403737982; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:42:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <z2od791b8791004160042u78d37992g5481a61f56170a3f@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sury-dnsext-cname-dname-00
From: Matthew Dempsky <matthew@dempsky.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury@nic.cz>, "namedroppers@ops.ietf.org" <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
> No.  DS only co-exists with delegating NS's.  If it wasn't obvious
> that is NS and SOA at the apex of a zone.  CNAME at a delegation
> would not be visible.
>
> The cache might see DS/NS/SOA/CNAME/DNAME all co-existing together
> but the authorative side would not under this regime.

Ah, got it.  I didn't catch that we were talking about authoritative
only, rather than in-general what records might need to coexist at an
owner name with CNAME records.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email