IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sury-dnsext-cname-dname-00

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Fri, 16 April 2010 03:11 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC1F3A6AEA; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.385
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.385 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SngZrgmSDotA; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB273A6AE4; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1O2btp-000Kzt-Mf for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 03:07:21 +0000
Received: from [2001:4f8:3:bb::5] (helo=farside.isc.org) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <marka@isc.org>) id 1O2btj-000Kx3-RT for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 03:07:15 +0000
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (drugs.dv.isc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:820:214:22ff:fed9:fbdc]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "drugs.dv.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (not verified)) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DD9E8649; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 03:07:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3G37Boh091390; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:07:11 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org)
Message-Id: <201004160307.o3G37Boh091390@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Cc: Matthew Dempsky <matthew@dempsky.org>, Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury@nic.cz>, "namedroppers@ops.ietf.org" <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sury-dnsext-cname-dname-00
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:03:19 +1000."
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:07:11 +1000
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

Mark Andrews writes:
> 
> In message <o2sd791b8791004151944g40f2aeedk5140cadc394be44e@mail.gmail.com>, 
> Ma
> tthew Dempsky writes:
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
> > > And if one is relaxing CNAME and other data rules then NS and SOA
> > > are also obvious candidates.
> > 
> > And DS?
> 
> No.  DS only co-exists with delegating NS's.  If it wasn't obvious
> that is NS and SOA at the apex of a zone.  CNAME at a delegation
> would not be visible.
> 
> The cache might see DS/NS/SOA/CNAME/DNAME all co-existing together
> but the authorative side would not under this regime.

	Make that DS/NS/SOA/CNAME/DNAME/DNSKEY/NSEC/KEY/SIG/RRSIG.
 
	Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email