Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-03.txt
Scott Rose <scottr.nist@gmail.com> Tue, 12 June 2012 19:14 UTC
Return-Path: <scottr.nist@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE41621F8699 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KzlEw28nUTuy for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wsget1.nist.gov (wsget1.nist.gov [129.6.13.150]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F5321F867C for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WSGHUB1.xchange.nist.gov (129.6.42.34) by wsget1.nist.gov (129.6.13.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:14:39 -0400
Received: from smtp.nist.gov (129.6.16.226) by smtp-g.nist.gov (129.6.42.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.355.2; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:12:22 -0400
Received: from 6-140.antd.nist.gov (6-140.antd.nist.gov [129.6.140.6]) by smtp.nist.gov (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q5CJEhXJ001739 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:14:43 -0400
From: Scott Rose <scottr.nist@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8494EC22-3971-4895-AE76-F98C10C905D8"
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:14:43 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20120612191008.895.6966.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <20120612191008.895.6966.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <281F62E8-574F-4F10-ACB9-148A58BEAC6F@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Subject: Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:14:47 -0000
Not too many changes here. Mostly to make sure all the sections (header, abstract, intro) are all in sync. Scott =================================== Scott Rose NIST scott.rose@nist.gov +1 301-975-8439 Google Voice: +1 571-249-3671 http://www.dnsops.gov/ =================================== On Jun 12, 2012, at 3:10 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the DNS Extensions Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm Implementation Status > Author(s) : Scott Rose > Filename : draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-03.txt > Pages : 6 > Date : 2012-06-12 > > Abstract: > The DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) requires the use of > cryptographic algorithm suites for generating digital signatures over > DNS data. There is currently an IANA registry for these algorithms > that lacks the recommended implementation status of each algorithm. > This document provides an applicability statement on algorithm > implementation status for DNSSEC component software. This document > lists each algorithm's status based on the current reference. In the > case that an algorithm is specified without an implementation status, > this document assigns one. This document updates RFCs 2536, 2539, > 3110, 4034, 4398, 5155, 5702, and 5933. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/submission.filename }}-03 > > A diff from previous version is available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-03 > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > dnsext mailing list > dnsext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-alg… internet-drafts
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec… Scott Rose
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec… Steve Crocker