Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-03.txt

Scott Rose <scottr.nist@gmail.com> Tue, 12 June 2012 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <scottr.nist@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE41621F8699 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KzlEw28nUTuy for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wsget1.nist.gov (wsget1.nist.gov [129.6.13.150]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F5321F867C for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WSGHUB1.xchange.nist.gov (129.6.42.34) by wsget1.nist.gov (129.6.13.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:14:39 -0400
Received: from smtp.nist.gov (129.6.16.226) by smtp-g.nist.gov (129.6.42.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.355.2; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:12:22 -0400
Received: from 6-140.antd.nist.gov (6-140.antd.nist.gov [129.6.140.6]) by smtp.nist.gov (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q5CJEhXJ001739 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:14:43 -0400
From: Scott Rose <scottr.nist@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8494EC22-3971-4895-AE76-F98C10C905D8"
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:14:43 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20120612191008.895.6966.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <20120612191008.895.6966.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <281F62E8-574F-4F10-ACB9-148A58BEAC6F@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Subject: Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:14:47 -0000

Not too many changes here.  Mostly to make sure all the sections (header, abstract, intro) are all in sync.  

Scott

===================================
Scott Rose
NIST
scott.rose@nist.gov
+1 301-975-8439
Google Voice: +1 571-249-3671
http://www.dnsops.gov/
===================================

On Jun 12, 2012, at 3:10 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:

> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the DNS Extensions Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 	Title           : Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm Implementation Status
> 	Author(s)       : Scott Rose
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-03.txt
> 	Pages           : 6
> 	Date            : 2012-06-12
> 
> Abstract:
>   The DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) requires the use of
>   cryptographic algorithm suites for generating digital signatures over
>   DNS data.  There is currently an IANA registry for these algorithms
>   that lacks the recommended implementation status of each algorithm.
>   This document provides an applicability statement on algorithm
>   implementation status for DNSSEC component software.  This document
>   lists each algorithm's status based on the current reference.  In the
>   case that an algorithm is specified without an implementation status,
>   this document assigns one.  This document updates RFCs 2536, 2539,
>   3110, 4034, 4398, 5155, 5702, and 5933.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/submission.filename }}-03
> 
> A diff from previous version is available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-03
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dnsext mailing list
> dnsext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext