IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] WG opinion on draft : Improvements to DNS Resolvers, for Resiliency, Robustness, and Responsiveness

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Tue, 22 February 2011 22:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93703A67B5 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:49:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oDomvEbVak8k for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:49:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737933A6983 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:49:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 24080 invoked by uid 399); 22 Feb 2011 22:49:43 -0000
Received: from router.ka9q.net (HELO doug-optiplex.ka9q.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@75.60.237.91) by mail2.fluidhosting.com with ESMTPAM; 22 Feb 2011 22:49:43 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 75.60.237.91
X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us
Message-ID: <4D643D85.2020801@dougbarton.us>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:49:41 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110129 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "W.C.A. Wijngaards" <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
References: <4D622624.90303@ogud.com> <BF79BE89-20B2-4897-B07C-1426745C4AA9@verisign.com> <AANLkTinQig=e7wv-3GsXi73p3AKQOsbjE6EzDNMbWWRw@mail.gmail.com> <4D63907A.8010700@nlnetlabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <4D63907A.8010700@nlnetlabs.nl>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] WG opinion on draft : Improvements to DNS Resolvers, for Resiliency, Robustness, and Responsiveness
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:49:03 -0000

On 02/22/2011 02:31, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote:
> I read (and implemented) this draft (as config options) some time ago.

Can you elaborate?


-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email