Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-06

Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@nlnetlabs.nl> Wed, 09 May 2012 10:53 UTC

Return-Path: <matthijs@nlnetlabs.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29DB921F85B6 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 03:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.435
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.164, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LhVnInav3B61 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 03:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from open.nlnetlabs.nl (open.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA12C21F85B5 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2012 03:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.27] (a83-160-139-153.adsl.xs4all.nl [83.160.139.153]) (authenticated bits=0) by open.nlnetlabs.nl (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q49Ari19018020 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:53:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from matthijs@nlnetlabs.nl)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=default; t=1336560826; bh=FAyLDWSVn4THHjbJqb0ahOtc9YqYb6wCkcizGZFDBeo=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=C+RkD+Z8cfT314rnqWyzbRn2tV3/qmxVVvjLVO7ByIP4BboEuChvhzoQvP+FJuelp 5foS2rDe1/df7qa8VSJndXAlKaHUBMgvyPQ+mVBbVfacogSWdCxLqY/wvKlfL8A2gB gs5vBxSxkMwadLMnwwUFO3Z6YXdhpqXFG1h3cxkY=
Message-ID: <4FAA4CB8.4010505@nlnetlabs.nl>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 12:53:44 +0200
From: Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@nlnetlabs.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <201205041846.UAA07933@TR-Sys.de>
In-Reply-To: <201205041846.UAA07933@TR-Sys.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (open.nlnetlabs.nl [213.154.224.1]); Wed, 09 May 2012 12:53:45 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-06
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 10:53:48 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I agree with Alfred. I have the following nit comments that can also
be easily fixed later (see below).

Best regards,
  Matthijs


Nits:

Section 1 (Introduction):
                           v
"These algorithm codes tells..." -> "These algorithm codes tell..."

                                    v              v
"Likewise, Delegation Signer (DS) RR's and NSEC3 RR's use..." ->
"Likewise, Delegation Signer (DS) RRs and NSEC3 RRs use..."

                                    vv
"deployment of code that implements a newly deployed digital signature
algorithm, DS hash and NSEC3 hash algorithm used..." ->
         ^                                 ^
"deployment of code that implements newly deployed digital signature
algorithms, DS hash and NSEC3 hash algorithms used..."

                      vvvvvvvvvvvvvv
"A zone administrator may be able to determine..." -> "A zone
administrator is able to determine..." or "A zone administrator may
determine..."

Section 2:
      vv
"The ENDS0 specification..." -> "The EDNS0 specification..."

             v
"take up 22-34 octets..." -> "take up 22-32 octets..."

On 05/04/2012 08:46 PM, Alfred � wrote:
> With the exception of the minor oversight of repeated occurrences 
> of a single textual flaw pointed out in my WGLC comments, I am 
> satisfied with the revised draft version (-06).
> 
> Applying the change from "cryptographic and hash algorithms" (or
> similar) to "digital signature and hash algorithms" twice more (in
> the Abstract and in Section 8) should not need another draft 
> iteration now -- that can easily be fixed later.
> 
> So IMHO, the draft now should be ready for publication request to
> the IESG.
> 
> Best regards, Alfred.
> 
> _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing
> list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPqky4AAoJEA8yVCPsQCW529AH+wf5BgbpwwHS7F462xKj4rXI
Y2rgGcdA5GUY9VL5WrQaENZajC8m7v6Z2dFcfQIVOx55MlBtjfB5vrEwCmE6F5J2
zdTaoSFhmsqp8Ub7VEpuMldByj/zTIc5OjxMZSIkmZX0+A5qYqO4UswUPONYt05d
/szjzMA/zDN9GFj9DtghmBLTUSN4Yy6U8VrLK8lExS000AUp59tImzB7wVYq1Rfs
b4vjJ2GvoHEou6nMymx1bmVfnn5RDoBJWWQO18PVhy/GtBi7lkexuLvFWLBTxIK9
e8QgbB/TJRS6hKlahqS0qbH8QRnFI53IaSCFzK5Xx9/E4cMjkUF3pSoL+t1XhLQ=
=ybs3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----