IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld next steps

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Tue, 07 March 2023 23:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39ACFC1522DA; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 15:48:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hopcount.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y7ZkJAD4UnXg; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 15:48:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-4022.proton.ch (mail-4022.proton.ch [185.70.40.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58229C1522C8; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 15:48:23 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 23:48:08 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=protonmail; t=1678232900; x=1678492100; bh=abN31w6q+JRaKIuepcle4mw+cIhXd1JTMadiR5gdUK4=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=m0SID06O3Y+r2YEQwV34n5+mytoH6UB0qFl2krUbrkB7wAuU7uLG/NHHtEnpJnDLc YNrY3QOgNqFxrJ06PMjm1rTWffp8y8S8kP2AUoFiLmfYr4Reig7hIaPhTcN/IvdNhM fox193b9fee6/e7HhBkO4X6ElPyOcQLbBGvC6MXNC5uiXRffl9G5jMqWD6c229s8ga pIUXogYdFzq+Vt7ZkX5aWaU2ZJrAZPMzyEjEhYOWCV2XkUdR3Grj7tsKpEOmceyx/G tRwA/dqxDMIHrN0mTCdgP1Jo1NfehHZYPueUcEZocRHCv96y72gSnqeOLJ0eKk9c9H HmggyzjJXlVrw==
To: drc@virtualized.org, rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org
Message-ID: <sny4YxiPNJ_UMwBbRSihZAUwVdUZzmtTD_UdDrT65ln5TX3fm-MoEGcGnTvUfCeQ9bM-yi8zDwU5XG2UWuB1CuxqB6thEeIq8svDL5AIu1Y=@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <42DD4138-2596-4DF7-BA0B-B64E7CE67AAE@virtualized.org>
References: <BY5PR11MB419690E9C767816AB4A0CB4FB5B79@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <42DD4138-2596-4DF7-BA0B-B64E7CE67AAE@virtualized.org>
Feedback-ID: 62430589:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_l7cRcvYjZDwGUVqjkQOI28GwgSd2BIA8YQApuYExcYo"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/1sRyhlZX8XXq2bX9qRTyhsYRhFo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld next steps
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 23:48:28 -0000

On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 15:56, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:

> 4 weeks for ICANN (which? Organization, Board, Community, all 3?) to provide feedback? (That feels sort of like the ITU asking "the IETF" for feedback on an IP-related protocol document in 4 weeks.)

Did the IETF (also which?) provide feedback on this similar request for feedback?

https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/proposed-procedure-for-selecting-a-top-level-domain-string-for-private-use-13-01-2023

It seems like the answer is no. Perhaps it would be useful for someone to decide whether these ships are intentionally passing in the night or whether more attention to navigation is required.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email