Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld next steps

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Tue, 07 March 2023 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42C3C14CE3D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 13:02:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.893
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.893 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=virtualized-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y-d1V_nkaole for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 13:02:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf30.google.com (mail-qv1-xf30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f30]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95F26C151AED for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 12:56:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf30.google.com with SMTP id ev13so9802756qvb.10 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Mar 2023 12:56:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virtualized-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; t=1678222608; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=CcMOM4t6RitNB0rNUA6T7mUBYc4SaoTtaoah1uRPCs8=; b=rvU1YYt+SUBXjBXYiirM/cIv7Znwdt15/RT0ydYeaNTdY8CYr7RvogUN0yK5qmfVlt wVu0YBXHm8adGSZNHPuCRfkrC1ULCo2b3fMczDZB/7Zir4RCGwLDvZS0BHl1pSOzssi6 u7kz6hQIQQ0+EQXbzi92lnkQ5uHy4CW20gF93KGbnfLmgDTHDOT6yOhH6XrTiQX2ZYYp uwCc5oMbmYl0kAAYcW3/t1Hq/rnhZoWb7tllHN8oTRda9BbZI+2wBY4K0WCzyPcnykhm 7njJL3+9ek/x84DoqvAa9FVVhQNG0YWK9c2KY+HhARJCsi3sqq1VpQakivxtEjWvFPWj iG4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678222608; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CcMOM4t6RitNB0rNUA6T7mUBYc4SaoTtaoah1uRPCs8=; b=l9wc4QKs0IkZRt6PhY51c87fHxt+D+09o2M4lHCQlscBNnNhiuNi/RvDwbGU5MuEBS K1ArPt3CRRkmUz/QgMwHSp3kntMXOFiEHJTYhSJXJe1HV/sfO5+8aUffgC7+GsWX/VvV b0FFrORSvJZcTxByPqnVUDwkBLe43/q8i6z0lAADqScrc4alaLOYmiLNYmSy7S+KN81H Z84ZHj7fpr0MhPEJMj/56ATPofAGa/RAPc882ptGVoZZyvMcCh7t4INCDOsAjknuNylb kuairx0g8D/CnVUWDfbYVFpm527VPHRoHyOT0pqRp+oewG/6yncWgT9QAv51yNf8ikfa mCoA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVto16FwdNgXgH8EieoZjT6NdDiU6ItHO6kOejGkUmCIub7rsUa 8omtTl6WoDIoP5v0mIU4Eo7Zhw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/zQF0O+3P+yW03q2VL5HkGr6D22jcq9gLzZkFt0CzIg3+PUH8XoB8JQ8AiqCAfUwKu5PQciw==
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5bec:0:b0:56f:8a99:1a64 with SMTP id k12-20020ad45bec000000b0056f8a991a64mr25661486qvc.4.1678222608179; Tue, 07 Mar 2023 12:56:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2001:550:3002::2fe]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r136-20020a37a88e000000b0073b99d515e2sm10176804qke.44.2023.03.07.12.56.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Mar 2023 12:56:47 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\))
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB419690E9C767816AB4A0CB4FB5B79@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 15:56:36 -0500
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <42DD4138-2596-4DF7-BA0B-B64E7CE67AAE@virtualized.org>
References: <BY5PR11MB419690E9C767816AB4A0CB4FB5B79@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.400.51.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/M6TpkKzufY4k0n6KIP8vOGSWYKA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld next steps
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 21:02:10 -0000

Rob,

4 weeks for ICANN (which? Organization, Board, Community, all 3?) to provide feedback?  (That feels sort of like the ITU asking "the IETF" for feedback on an IP-related protocol document in 4 weeks.)

As I’m sure both Harald and Warren can attest, ICANN processes, particularly those for which a public consensus statement is the desired outcome, tend to take a teensy bit longer than 4 weeks. Also, given how long it has taken to get the -alt-tld draft out the door of IETF processes, 4 weeks might be seen as a bit hypocritical.

What’s the desired outcome here? The only possible outcome I can imagine that could come from a 4 week notice period would be for individual entities who happen to participate in/around ICANN to provide feedback, not for “ICANN” (whichever facet you might be envisioning) to comment. Is that sufficient?

Regards,
-drc

> On Mar 7, 2023, at 10:09 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I wanted to thank the WG, chairs, and authors, for their work and patience with me on the alt-tld draft and to let the WG know of the next steps.
> 
> Warren and Paul have posted an updated -22 version that addresses my AD review comments, and hence I will start a 4-week IETF LC on this version shortly (i.e., hopefully in the next couple of days - as soon as the liaison statement is good to go).
> 
> Wes, Mirja, and the DNSOP chairs, and Harald have helped me craft a liaison statement to send to ICANN once the LC has started (which will be sent from OPS Area) informing them of the progress of this document, hence also providing an opportunity for comments via the standard IETF LC process.  The extended 4-week IETF LC is to ensure that ICANN have enough time to review the document and provide any feedback that they may have.
> 
> My hope, and expectation, is that the document will then following the standard IETF document approval and publication process.
> 
> Regards,
> Rob
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop