Re: [DNSOP] on staleness of code points and code (mentions MD5 commentary from IETF98)

Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> Tue, 28 March 2017 02:43 UTC

Return-Path: <each@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D335129851 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 19:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GBoFhQkh3KHP for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 19:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 149E7127BA3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 19:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [149.20.48.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E1FF34930F; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 02:43:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id 0407D216C1C; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 02:43:00 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 02:43:00 +0000
From: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170328024259.GD96991@isc.org>
References: <58D96BC0.9040701@redbarn.org> <20170328024127.GC96991@isc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170328024127.GC96991@isc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/22olBX4zld88PQ7xR5Qq1womNe8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] on staleness of code points and code (mentions MD5 commentary from IETF98)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 02:43:03 -0000

Oopsie:

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 02:41:27AM +0000, Evan Hunt wrote:
> MD5 is known to be breakable, but it's not *as* breakable

as a zone

> that hasn't been signed

-- 
Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.