[DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 19 March 2018 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B9AD127333 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jxggcIfncCqb for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3E0F12D7FC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.47.60.131] (dhcp-9bb4.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.155.180]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w2JHl1HZ061236 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:47:03 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host dhcp-9bb4.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.155.180] claimed to be [10.47.60.131]
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:47:32 +0000
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.11r5462)
Message-ID: <3D490CA8-0733-47AD-A088-113B1116B207@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/36a4DWu4s-BmP3esmMcLMuD4Qcs>
Subject: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:47:46 -0000

Some folks had reservations about the current definition of "split DNS":
    "Where a corporate network serves up partly or completely different 
DNS inside and outside
    its firewall. There are many possible variants on this; the basic 
point is that the
    correspondence between a given FQDN (fully qualified domain name) 
and a given IPv4 address
    is no longer universal and stable over long periods."
    (Quoted from <xref target="RFC2775"/>, Section 3.8)

What would the WG like for this definition?

--Paul Hoffman