IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS

Artyom Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> Mon, 19 March 2018 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ximaera@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0097E128C0A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZAs-uZ57zTYO for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x232.google.com (mail-vk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C01C126C25 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id r197so10121667vke.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yjy8eTWO8U3NvSFdh+0Aj4q11jz0LYnhw4NtcL88Wr4=; b=ahJUCE2eOTFoOCUWmSy4DRUQZ86ITwqhBoaUnogfENFpk6Qoe4nTg504rDxb2BK2hK w0XUk63VJr1h+JRxNe5OovW3dEVoyMPKCHawHdZXC/n4sqA93U/tMnXNGAiRQbYtxS/B ZHCX1ZrG8dwQNPDm5daqIlxVOnb4lXWYo1NMyJKWVgAC4zthtwdI206Uqd1+Hywun/9v K/jNgloqF7l2sOUSfDMSXu1nzaC/5Y/kItLJFbzo0lfdPuGJCUXjOqN0KjuwQlSiOdr/ oFfmaQR2+/XXZ6qXLTPDUMIu20/i2Mx+HBir0UVQrnl/hw+xpc6I8JyNkGNL3IALwNdH ri0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yjy8eTWO8U3NvSFdh+0Aj4q11jz0LYnhw4NtcL88Wr4=; b=LMbp6SOiqh/J6D3+3PrvCiSC6rsnpp2DhijGJ3K0VoUAs4uTWKP2+MDgBmUeM0wNoB duKE45z3XL3KFp/nq1GsxsMDq68ap70POdGB1BPaTbqzRsTcnbxHTtf1WaJAMw5aw8OH fZef2PY+sIrIuAkr3zo3Ve5RxndX+VGsWZeB+1c3oQ3X/SLL1+4w3s7lNEbei2QpEsRR PEfgJ9iBU7nplZRVr5Qj9s81+NZmgnoWwhtVSS//FOaawg6TZpO3n5eobBo9DWwnwkcf T0CDaMjp9g9KBIqEAYjesqRJ5ErhY9v1KJsP7QsNk3g97OSTykFu4BNSPiUDXcZ8NqVG r3hw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GcFW8ELxofMwkvv1sVQP40PXSQuusE65RWImMFvM/Q5dIaRv3w +R/1WnJd7neY/9cXFqz5oPfFG8eCl45wduDCdZdLAtau
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvE0XVF6E3qcrwxuisuW1V+QkpAXbWYw83ODt+zhXJRum97RBvhC+OtuoJEgL3f9J47wlz852lAKkFVfRdgrU0=
X-Received: by 10.31.69.85 with SMTP id s82mr3859178vka.162.1521482475032; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.57.111 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3D490CA8-0733-47AD-A088-113B1116B207@vpnc.org>
References: <3D490CA8-0733-47AD-A088-113B1116B207@vpnc.org>
From: Artyom Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:00:54 +0000
Message-ID: <CALZ3u+a9o1g0ZTkGjqWwfyV9phovEgu6Linp137yvM=JHSnj-A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/LioH37EWJmcoU1JJF9-aEkEoTi0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:01:21 -0000

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
> [..] the basic point is that the
>    correspondence between a given FQDN (fully qualified domain name) and a
>    given IPv4 address is no longer universal and stable over long periods."

IP v. being whatever, 4 or 6, there's a bunch of reasons there's
virtually no correspondence between a given FQDN and a given IP
address nowadays. E.g. CDNs.

| Artyom Gavrichenkov
| gpg: 2deb 97b1 0a3c 151d b67f 1ee5 00e7 94bc 4d08 9191
| mailto: ximaera@gmail.com
| fb: ximaera
| telegram: xima_era
| skype: xima_era
| tel. no: +7 916 515 49 58

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email