Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] IETF 111 DNSOP WG agenda published

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Wed, 21 July 2021 00:11 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83EB53A0765 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yxhMBwM1gs96 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa4.dc.icann.org (ppa4.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFCD53A0764 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-E2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.7]) by ppa4.dc.icann.org (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with ESMTPS id 16L0BLeT007174 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 00:11:21 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.858.12; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:11:20 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.0858.012; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:11:20 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Benno Overeinder <benno@nlnetlabs.nl>
CC: DNSOP Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG agenda published
Thread-Index: AQHXfbqktmqcmh+iSEmtOwvxT+xcD6tNA8AA
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 00:11:20 +0000
Message-ID: <91ABABAE-42C4-46E1-B05F-9C666B3F85C7@icann.org>
References: <47ba379a-a2b8-36aa-5f1d-5f8a7db6fe01@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <47ba379a-a2b8-36aa-5f1d-5f8a7db6fe01@NLnetLabs.nl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A0925267-69A2-4FFE-A43E-32BFE5BB2E0C"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-07-20_15:2021-07-19, 2021-07-20 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/3M6R0VtrBlFPV5TicdHdEnOJDaQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] IETF 111 DNSOP WG agenda published
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 00:11:30 -0000

On Jul 20, 2021, at 3:57 PM, Benno Overeinder <benno@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
> 
> The DNSOP WG agenda for IETF 111 has been published, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/agenda-111-dnsop-04.

Earlier on the list, there was a discussion about how long the queue of current WG drafts was, and some of us suggested that the WG stop adopting new drafts while we pare down the queue. This agenda lists four possible additional new drafts for the WG.

Can you tell us ahead of time whether these proposals might become WG documents in the near future? I ask because there are many other drafts that might want to become part of the WG queue as well.

--Paul Hoffman