Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive-04: (with COMMENT)
Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> Wed, 06 January 2016 11:51 UTC
Return-Path: <sara@sinodun.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252921ACEED; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 03:51:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hATOcM6oEs0e; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 03:51:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shcp01.hosting.zen.net.uk (shcp01.hosting.zen.net.uk [88.98.24.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F40CE1ACEEC; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 03:51:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [62.232.251.194] (port=2237 helo=virgo.sinodun.com) by shcp01.hosting.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from <sara@sinodun.com>) id 1aGmcB-0000BC-6t; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 11:50:56 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160106075720.7532.15173.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 11:50:57 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <BEB4480F-B374-4CA5-8833-E97AB5885C18@sinodun.com>
References: <20160106075720.7532.15173.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - shcp01.hosting.zen.net.uk
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - sinodun.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: shcp01.hosting.zen.net.uk: authenticated_id: sara+sinodun.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/3T2UXgxWkXJwzvzKN2-0cWfWb8I>
Cc: tjw.ietf@gmail.com, draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 11:51:04 -0000
> On 6 Jan 2016, at 07:57, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > > Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive-04: No Objection > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- Section 1 -- > > Long-lived > TCP connections can result in lower request latency than the case > where UDP transport is used and truncated responses are received, > since clients that have fallen back to TCP transport in response to a > truncated response typically only uses the TCP session for a single > (request, response) pair, continuing with UDP transport for > subsequent queries. > > This is a really long, awkward sentence, and it appears to have an error > > in it that makes it unparseable. Point taken. I have re-worded it to make it clearer. > But the use > in > the abstract and at the top of page 4 are not. I suggest "clients > commonly use TCP only for retries" in the abstract, and "received over > UDP > with retries over TCP" on page 4. > Yes, I think this is clearer. I have updated as suggested. Changes are in the -05 version published this morning. Regards Sara.
- [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Barry Leiba
- Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-i… Sara Dickinson
- Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-i… Barry Leiba