Re: [DNSOP] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-04: (with COMMENT)
Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> Thu, 09 April 2020 19:48 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198D13A0CFC; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mwUg0sIwGl0X; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:48:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa2d.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 652F93A0CFA; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa2d.google.com with SMTP id f195so33583vka.4; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 12:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CneWrYjBnZiHv+q40uila5PRPZmAKJMLXOLhFJ9IRis=; b=Wr/VcpHSwBoAVTH3B3KE/kyfEJwMtgFeI+J6a8dFQ6r/Ki/BDhNjnDGHZI9GhbJLFd LH1fwcNvaWtZvLIgw5uqYZIAfE2NhIEiGE2s2+MP4EXb2Ll6Ji9QkiUDCCVsPfaDUxVe Ykr6TYlxp43j5rEm60PMzo9h172SNjYdfg3jdWclOEG2BXv7U2VJ6qztcUDscunBXZyc kRrJrvQsk3j4Picrxu2W7HDiJfNbo/BTmXt1Bha/XPUa4XMZR27Vi+YCMfHzqOQbKjhe AHU3b9BpXE9pBhmztkFgICf/2+QkilNzHRisy4nxdxObkfYjrYxGYQ1x0IGJMtuV9e+9 JzAA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CneWrYjBnZiHv+q40uila5PRPZmAKJMLXOLhFJ9IRis=; b=uAKpuL29gLcXQuXgCMFQ5Zd/K1I75gOoY4b7/6PkkPv3n6tQ4Fudo6qCJEwlaYpGVg /kuLVkW6ZS1vq5clJvPUS4Obl3vZgk4i0Yji25AeEtazH9Bg4/nR+AWiYUZKlrcJxjfi IWmnO7A+7Ixkf3YLVrIAP31K6qXyfvtED0QsxH/AZauW4kRy6yzCi6L+8S4h+qW0xQtZ dT0EIW4obrIoxinTvUsodjd0Eiy6j9PBmubP74s3YZKRO9EceKdRJlr5tTD+43LGUQ12 npUac5gGkF1aV6PRlYXC57KNMa3zmk13fDtBqJaTACPJQW8vlaKR3BUCOc6dYLPIpVIR j1VA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pubp4lIBNKzG+5OOR47aIuKzN9GBQUBenugNOF20gLoFTGzU2g1e gr8sZt6THJ2z8scAZkf0g6bNmi8iP+weJ/ArKO4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIczHw6byoCjESZ2vSiv8gZEfTND9AcVQXtzfwI3Ux7nVSv3uxKF+ng48TcR5bHJbwaHIGFUyGRW7D21Bb0P+A=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:ca04:: with SMTP id a4mr1080553vkg.65.1586461681189; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 12:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158640898724.3293.17093328253615706681@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158640898724.3293.17093328253615706681@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 12:47:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CAH1iCiqT6bdhKq2uUSH1AU7jf9zOQ1OEQNpwHWZn=h4A2w2AOw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec@ietf.org, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, DNSOP chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>, Benno Overeinder <benno@nlnetlabs.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f506ba05a2e0e466"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/4HEjH9HG6PAOMr0CkXKMr2SFij0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 19:48:04 -0000
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:10 PM Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker < noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > > Section 6.1, 6.2 > > Should we say anything about when it's safe for a new ZSK to be used to > sign responses? > I think, technically speaking, it is always safe to use a new ZSK, and the only concern is when it's safe to remove and/or revoke the old ZSK (i.e. that it is safe to use ONLY the new ZSK.) Brian
- [DNSOP] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ie… Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
- Re: [DNSOP] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draf… Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draf… Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draf… Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draf… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [DNSOP] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draf… Shumon Huque