Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space
manning <bmanning@karoshi.com> Thu, 09 July 2015 01:20 UTC
Return-Path: <bmanning@karoshi.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041391A8949 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_I_LETTER=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7xrg6GcC05Ck for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vacation.karoshi.com (vacation.karoshi.com [198.32.6.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1C81A8944 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vacation.karoshi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8FDA36FD2; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at karoshi.com
Received: from vacation.karoshi.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vacation.karoshi.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ejr7iHaEvMsO; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:20:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.4] (cpe-172-90-219-168.socal.res.rr.com [172.90.219.168]) by vacation.karoshi.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65698A36FC4; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: manning <bmanning@karoshi.com>
In-Reply-To: <8C0FED76-4335-4769-A9AD-5B8289E0FFA5@virtualized.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 18:18:29 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6F5F4AF8-4EFF-4668-AF64-2499FB856ADA@karoshi.com>
References: <0C60FA46-50FB-4F4A-9ABA-6CB2953305D8@shinkuro.com> <D1C03490.CB9E%edward.lewis@icann.org> <201507070942.t679gQbB009861@bela.nlnetlabs.nl> <4CD57909-33BA-40C4-957C-506948041223@pch.net> <559BAD6D.20306@lisse.NA> <5136B564-6E5E-49CD-814E-4E91D7CF9491@pch.net> <8C0FED76-4335-4769-A9AD-5B8289E0FFA5@virtualized.org>
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/58WHnVh76YCSbmUlcGsSTm8l9Jk>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 01:20:36 -0000
Hum… The then director has no recollection of that and a request to ICANN to produce such a letter was denied. All we have is an assertion that a request was made. Neither Herb, nor Bob have any idea what happened. In the interests of openness & transparency, one might expect less demure behaviors. I would go into more detail, but it is not WG related. …. back in Dec 2014, this exchange occurred: ———— > > I have been doing some research and can find no one here at ISI who remembers this communication and there is no written record of this exchange. Would it be possible to get a copy from you? > It does not appear to be available from the normal ICANN archives. Thanks for your enquiry. It is standard IANA practice that the details of the communications we have with directly involved parties are held in confidence. For requests relating to substantial changes of control for ccTLDs (e.g. delegations, transfers and retirement) a report is published after the conclusion of such requests that is a distillation of the relevant facts, but the underlying communications with the parties are not. With kindest regards, Kim Davies Internet Assigned Numbers Authority ICANN ——————— manning bmanning@karoshi.com PO Box 12317 Marina del Rey, CA 90295 310.322.8102 On 8July2015Wednesday, at 17:36, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote: > No. > > At the time, the Administrative Contact as listed in the IANA Whois database was USC-ISI. They (IIRC, the Director of ISI) requested the TLD to be removed from the root zone. > > Regards, > -drc > >> On Jul 8, 2015, at 12:57 AM, Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> wrote: >> >> >>> On Jul 7, 2015, at 6:43 PM, Dr Eberhard Lisse <el@lisse.NA> wrote: >>> My recollection is somewhat different from the AC "requesting" the >>> revocation. >> >> I meant the Department of the Interior. If I’m remembering correctly. >> >> -Bill >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> DNSOP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
- [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Steve Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Bill Woodcock
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Dr Eberhard Lisse
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Dr Eberhard Lisse
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Alain Durand
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Steve Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Steve Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Bill Woodcock
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Dr Eberhard Lisse
- [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top level… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top l… Hugo Maxwell Connery
- Re: [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top l… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top l… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top l… Rubens Kuhl
- Re: [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top l… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space manning
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Alain Durand
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top l… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top l… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top l… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space David Conrad