Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space
Alain Durand <alain.durand@icann.org> Tue, 07 July 2015 23:00 UTC
Return-Path: <alain.durand@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2EF1B29F6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 16:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.431
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KtaXggwwEXQN for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 16:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-1.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF50E1B2A30 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 16:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 16:00:41 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 16:00:41 -0700
From: Alain Durand <alain.durand@icann.org>
To: "steve@shinkuro.com" <steve@shinkuro.com>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space
Thread-Index: AQHQtxWSGRCCGWg1Y0aLbOCi0zAIxZ3Q1ZuA
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 23:00:41 +0000
Message-ID: <D1C1951F.7A30%alain.durand@icann.org>
References: <0C60FA46-50FB-4F4A-9ABA-6CB2953305D8@shinkuro.com>
In-Reply-To: <0C60FA46-50FB-4F4A-9ABA-6CB2953305D8@shinkuro.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.47.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3519140439_2883247"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/KZSewg4ORbRbxUzAvzh6LcdipVI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 23:00:47 -0000
Putting the focus on this part of Steve¹s original email for now: On 7/5/15, 7:26 AM, "DNSOP on behalf of Steve Crocker" <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of steve@shinkuro.com> wrote: > >o ICANN speaks indistinctly about subset 5. > >o Does the IETF have a process for moving a name from subset 2 to subset >4? Ideally, I would argue we may not need such a process. Beside experimentation with strings like xx-, subset 2 should be empty or, at least, not ground for consideration to move to subset 4. So, beside grand-fathering a few strings, what is needed is a process that is less ambiguous and simpler to evaluate than RFC6761 to reserve strings in subset 4. Maybe something along the lines of IETF validates the technical merits of the proposal and ICANN validates the suggested name That leads us to the next point: >o A process for coordination between the IETF and ICANN regarding subsets >2, 4 and 5 would be helpful. RFC6761 does not say anything about such a coordination process. We have now learned a lot going through this round of 6761 candidates, so it is time to work on 6761bis, with, among other things, this coordination between ICANN and IETF on the agenda. Alain.
- [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Steve Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Bill Woodcock
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Dr Eberhard Lisse
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Dr Eberhard Lisse
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Alain Durand
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Steve Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Steve Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Bill Woodcock
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Dr Eberhard Lisse
- [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top level… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top l… Hugo Maxwell Connery
- Re: [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top l… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top l… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top l… Rubens Kuhl
- Re: [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top l… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space manning
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Alain Durand
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top l… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top l… hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] perspective Re: Thoughts on the top l… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Thoughts on the top level name space David Conrad