[DNSOP] Updates to AS 112 WG drafts
"William F. Maton Sotomayor" <wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca> Tue, 10 March 2009 21:45 UTC
Return-Path: <wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AE43A693F for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39iAcxi3gjGv for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca [IPv6:2001:410:9000:127::10]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E323A6844 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2ALjsT3012316 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:45:59 -0400
Received: from localhost (wmaton@localhost) by ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n2ALjsvK012313 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:45:54 -0400
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:45:54 -0400
From: "William F. Maton Sotomayor" <wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812162226590.32621@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Subject: [DNSOP] Updates to AS 112 WG drafts
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:45:26 -0000
All, After somewhat of a longer hiatus on Peter's part (the WG last call on one document seems to have drifted by and then dropped) and my part (largely to do with increased workload), I have finally put together new versions of each draft. The proceeding is based on some correspondence between the ID authors and Peter relating to some issues that were left on the burner, so I wanted to summarize them here to add context. Many suggestions by volunteer reviewers had been incorporated into the help-help draft (and to a lesser extent the -ops draft) for revision 01 of each document. However, discussion traffic faded after their release. One comment on -help-help had been raised by Olafur, located here: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg05601.html None of the versions of this draft address his comment, nor was there any discernable (at least in the archives) comment made on it by others on the WG list. I wanted to remind people about this one and see if the silence meant that there wasn't an issue after all. Next, there seemed to be no opposition in the working group meeting from March 2007 to have both of these go to WGLC: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/07mar/minutes/dnsop.txt In the successive meeting, it looks like -help-help made it to WGLC: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/07jul/minutes/dnsop.txt Then there's the issue of IPv6 transport which seems to be heading towards a separate draft. (I haven't asked about what happened to the LOA discussions for AS112, but that's off topic to this email.) In the Vancouver 2007 IETF, the -01 submissions were recognized: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/07dec/minutes/dnsop.txt Anyways, the review trail picks up after that: -Mohsen Souissi pointed out Mark Andrews' draft on local zones was renamed. -Stephane Bortzmeyer was very keen that these drafts stated that we were documenting current practices. I think the intention was to leave the door wide open for a future ID on AS112 operations, aimed at addressing outstanding issues (maybe adding zones, IPv6 transport, DNSSEC, etc). -Stephane points out that there is no AS112 NOC contact in -help-help (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg06006.html) -Andrew Sullivan around the same time made some additional comments on -ops: (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg05973.html) Then it stops cold. Peter Koch then provided some very useful comments on -help-help-01. These are now rolled into 02. Otherwise the -02 versions have taken the above into account. Thanks, wfms
- [DNSOP] Updates to AS 112 WG drafts William F. Maton Sotomayor
- Re: [DNSOP] Updates to AS 112 WG drafts Chris Thompson
- Re: [DNSOP] Updates to AS 112 WG drafts Chris Thompson