IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Updates to AS 112 WG drafts

Chris Thompson <cet1@cam.ac.uk> Thu, 12 March 2009 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <cet1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FCF3A6B73 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.515
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.515 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.084, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ucxah+u4vS0C for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.135]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C943A6BA4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:38796) by ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.155]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:cet1) id 1LhqV8-00039C-GN (Exim 4.70) (return-path <cet1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:23:30 +0000
Received: from prayer by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local (PRAYER:cet1) id 1LhqV8-0007d7-1y (Exim 4.67) (return-path <cet1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:23:30 +0000
Received: from [131.111.11.47] by webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.1); 12 Mar 2009 19:23:29 +0000
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:23:29 +0000
From: Chris Thompson <cet1@cam.ac.uk>
To: wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca
Message-ID: <Prayer.1.3.1.0903121923290.22836@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812162226590.32621@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812162226590.32621@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
X-Mailer: Prayer v1.3.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Sender: Chris Thompson <cet1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Updates to AS 112 WG drafts
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:22:54 -0000

Another (sorry!) nit in draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops-02:

There are inconsistencies in which of these two URLs is the preferred
one to be put in the informational TXT records:

   http://as112.net/
   http://www.as112.net/

In fact, as the DNS is at the moment, the first works only by virtue
of browser guesswork (there is no address record for as112.net).

Not that I can get any response out of www.as112.net = 204.152.184.180
at the moment, either ... :-(

-- 
Chris Thompson
Email: cet1@cam.ac.uk

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email