[DNSOP] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-16: (with COMMENT)

[Erik Kline via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-16
CC @ekline

* comment syntax:
  - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md

* "Handling Ballot Positions":
  - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/

## Comments

### S1

* "TCP avoids fragmentation by ..."

  TCP also benefits hugely from widespread support for MSS rewriting.  If
  something like an "EDNS0 Payload Size rewriting" function was available
  and as widely deployed there might be a very different conversation to
  be had.

  No text changes necessary; just a random thought.