[DNSOP] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-16: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 03 January 2024 20:30 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0619C151082; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 12:30:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, benno@NLnetLabs.nl, swoolf@pir.org, tjw.ietf@gmail.com, tjw.ietf@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.1.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <170431380483.21411.11748051939447815650@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 12:30:04 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/L4fryKdzxdkXxqM3j70gjHC6SGg>
Subject: [DNSOP] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 20:30:04 -0000

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you to Donald Eastlake for his SECDIR review.  Please review his proposed
text on including clarifying language around the applicability of TSIG.

I support Martin Duke and Rob Wilton’s DISCUSS positions.

** Section 7.2
   This would indicate prior
   reliance upon IP fragmentation, which is universally considered to be
   harmful to both the performance and stability of applications,
   endpoints, and gateways.

Is there a reference that can be cited to substantiate this “universal”
position?