Re: [DNSOP] Simplified Updates of DNS Security Trust Anchors, for rolling the root key

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 30 June 2015 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9921B2AFA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 06:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EXThBPSPHpC6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 06:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B74571B2AF9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 06:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:34434) by ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.159]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1Z9vxI-0007bB-YW (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:52:08 +0100
Received: from fanf2 by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local id 1Z9vxI-0008P6-Jx (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:52:08 +0100
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:52:08 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D2179D9-9963-4FA6-9EF8-94D80BD52183@ogud.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1506301450250.3128@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <CAHw9_iKmhA+f8QyuLkWeXQDfwprydVaGkR+LVJACGtsTB0+Pfw@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6NTqzTS9TYZ9C3gAkHFjZ_hpH7svnHgZZhhGMff3DVEb62Tw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1506301341240.3128@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <8D2179D9-9963-4FA6-9EF8-94D80BD52183@ogud.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="1870869256-1247320786-1435672328=:3128"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/7Ms1JMHGuJHtDR9UzZkXtnjU7KU>
Cc: Olafur Gudmundsson <olafur@cloudflare.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Simplified Updates of DNS Security Trust Anchors, for rolling the root key
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 13:52:17 -0000

Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> wrote:
>
> I do not yet propose what name or record is used for this experiment but
> having it an “address of an object” would be good as that enables
> testing from browsers. (CNAME is just as good as an address)

But my point is you can't find out a validator's RFC 5011 state using the
AD bit. There is no way to get AD for one key and not for another key.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
South Utsire: Variable 4 becoming southeasterly 4 or 5. Slight, becoming
slight or moderate. Mainly fair. Good, occasionally poor.