[DNSOP] draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal and DNAME

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 10 November 2017 12:18 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A67812EC13 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 04:18:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G6SmixhEDlYf for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 04:18:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8769712702E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 04:18:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 0B82C31D12; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:18:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F1908EC10C2; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:12:41 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 20:12:41 +0800
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20171110121241.GA2621@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8I4w9QnusBSaYzo2XKO0NOI8SJ4>
Subject: [DNSOP] draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal and DNAME
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:18:27 -0000

draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal-00 says "This document requests that the
.internal TLD be assigned to the IANA (similar to the way that
.example is) and a DNSSEC insecure delegation (that is, a delegation
with no DS records) be inserted into the root-zone, delegated to
blackhole-[12].iana.org."

This implies NS records in the root. Why not using the DNAMEs of RFC
7535 instead? I understand there is currently no ICANN process to add
DNAME in the root zone but there is no process to add .internal
either.

(draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root may be relevant here.)