IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Add] new draft: draft-grover-add-policy-detection-00

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Mon, 15 July 2019 12:58 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868B5120131 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 05:58:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2wzdr98k9Htb for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 05:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A07C812012A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 05:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id r1so16971290wrl.7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 05:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=d5WX+F3QNeNneZsraLp4hciwTzINb5K/khCmc30FOWY=; b=T7g+u8dDVje3Le0pTgxL0vgHSIIO5LY7udkdWRpb+3d22aiZgRjxLUb8oZP86TLg5W RvQ6g/xBoHnPVZK8JxmvhhQttr3JmCgwD0VVzzlkCL6gOTdEeZKL4xJZ0O4HZFUN2sI1 G5f5P6wKtoSLwYaynx2BFTjlgrlmA5VM/H323ZaLAC5p9FpsC5YM48tyShaYHIjQS/mO CLkEThZiFzhNob5DUoUTA+BCd2TJ0sogMfJ5bE/bDVev8EVb7Z+bwN6//YqIipfu3qen pBPmkfkL2Rgq+l60OoF9ffyxkOeXGi/9FSLeQq1Vgk4rPhnkDCcl77C+Nu/7bdAFrNzN C3Lw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=d5WX+F3QNeNneZsraLp4hciwTzINb5K/khCmc30FOWY=; b=YCpT5ZgPhkZnV/YM2rwOSwWIbgv1uQI3IA7mLj7u/QZF14C8XTEfayMpqftZB1frr8 PeY92VZQzkwDcRsu+8GBQnViX4zOnckA2tsZ+bUopCndiPTSyvhRoO+QH/Qjuq+38oUn 4FAPz93AMfGxOhAMSJAhD1xkXIdBnqOMFCvT2koy7F9Z/zzsF4VHSa/tnBHPYrzS+go6 4CtLcuiwUyZYoCp7gNM+oNZLk+sGOOf+hEFg6UF84V9UDKlGq1kV/AmSPbebBpkGFIzq TkGSoaQq41iQ4JAmWPLXSNllgYXK9pdqXthtv36396UdNxY+BbZ1Zod49j9uJRy5IxRO oWwA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXMPKqaWjK4pU7zfZM6jsur78ykC4kFPDzLCqf7JADhSXnQP5Iv 7HlYochXR0PVuFZkEjj3t3w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxt9Qd/GevV9E4f9l6zUHc24R0gG37HANqvAN70zv1pxzzOIVjkObwqkd0/V8zbr36tWYEYug==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:4b:: with SMTP id k11mr28110959wrx.82.1563195533113; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 05:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620::2830:110:a8c1:efdb:1842:8034? ([2620:0:2830:110:a8c1:efdb:1842:8034]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s10sm21009141wmf.8.2019.07.15.05.58.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Jul 2019 05:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_19DB262E-598E-4441-A92E-317AB4FF6802"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SyVmgMpD6Cd=m2Z03nts-Bv9ZVgJkG8oaj_jzwYMUZuCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:58:50 -0400
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailbutler-Message-Id: 8DEC16AF-62D7-4FB0-AEBC-6D5ED21D45C1
Message-Id: <896ACE4A-9A70-4011-BBCC-680F31ADA530@virtualized.org>
References: <CAChr6SyVmgMpD6Cd=m2Z03nts-Bv9ZVgJkG8oaj_jzwYMUZuCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8gtTzLZS2k-jGq0E9qqRGXeJpjg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Add] new draft: draft-grover-add-policy-detection-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 12:58:58 -0000

On Jul 14, 2019, at 7:09 PM, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:
> Was DNS intentionally designed to be insecure?

What’s your definition of “secure”?

DNS had clear design elements for availability. DNSSEC added integrity. Confidentiality wasn’t a design goal.

Regards,
-drc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email