Re: [DNSOP] [Add] [Ext] new draft: draft-grover-add-policy-detection-00

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Thu, 18 July 2019 00:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26F812015C; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MAJV6_Ydc3tT; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01D2B12003E; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id k20so48630969ios.10; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=38aDzHzM8lyen1GSo49M8zKLC1Go1nQAy0OxIenV1Y8=; b=J40Oh2FeDR5pCFHQ61WNbfRatQO9Eg0HDW18retjk5845ZzwkqG3xn+eRJJ+vVC9tS 8yo+nXzYQwfqxmJzcS+HmDfoFrMQ3zpbB3VhEd8LPrpN36WnoJDFroCmuvgHyX6hqP0O agTJ2m2AFC5B4DZpGxgW4oUKjqgEZP43dvTFxgjTQQuVa8puN5SrnfqIUtj24ivtQkUv lgKzfSst14W5OtquDGyD16qIUDGAYa/cIh6VF21hotlfS6ksVffA53FgWqsBHTAvhAC9 bXm0elBTNSjoX2lrV0e05XBsOK255iRlvxr/R9tY1hHz6+qrR0k0IEPHFKINcsBB4XS/ EMaw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=38aDzHzM8lyen1GSo49M8zKLC1Go1nQAy0OxIenV1Y8=; b=eMohZcVcHjN9HfggGu4PDW1n6IUm1u0L+jCiilBumvEtoFpjwrnxQW/CZEkQY+V49J vI0XAyEkdkucr8jth1Ar9dNEf6jteD6VGzdUMhq7twlPvVs4779Jv+eW+50mW7+fRNHi ANkr0g3XYWGut1IpDmZWTYZP8pD8znqSOBSV9SG+kUKPp7h81w0fdRDk2gxCgb2X9z+y JuQkELXcoTKA3GowQO+N2zFoSJtHW+1e7Y/UXS83qV7XTjww1W/FVRF3pK2RF1t+HYSR B1wdA1AeBMmvzxQIZH4Kx8ImUYNFL1XNgKoUVaGoqfSkcAQcaQAmSNdnLMFvt8/cYCHm tk2A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXdf0rS2cm1HAPj/25BwOUqI2sQvxQGWU4HNmVqQ2iONkDJkhFv sXsZt9ScUWftqA9lBaXT9vuJTjU41xeFM1ZZytg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqytbMK2HiNjcdUznv91xl6WQEclL4GHMTbyOlU5rVAhaHfsqQiAaouk9iQ5DBTAHDa7ooDv3sful6uMyr6JDu8=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:1a86:: with SMTP id 128mr45463859jai.95.1563408741174; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156260800560.777.13636536980052967232.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <65f155e9-81c7-daac-8e77-e366d0f924fb@pmtu.dev> <D7C1C0E7-584D-45CC-8B40-FFA9A8AB810D@fl1ger.de> <MN2PR21MB1213C09DAD5D71E7B0722481FAC90@MN2PR21MB1213.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <C772DFC6-0DED-44C6-862E-FC8591341AD6@icann.org> <CAChr6SwAYRy6qRJVecCjoTzgqKf6OynYTbDqxvT6KqhDmqg7fQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFD350E-D791-413D-8BB6-EF646CA61D8C@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAFD350E-D791-413D-8BB6-EF646CA61D8C@icann.org>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:12:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sw4F01tD69tcPHqaZY4mxPP09cdm-rzR9G8-xAiQ6Z-uw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, "add@ietf.org" <add@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a816ff058de976bf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/KLPUkgwPvABzK5cS1LdppNcPngI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Add] [Ext] new draft: draft-grover-add-policy-detection-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:12:24 -0000

On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 5:08 PM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:

> On Jul 17, 2019, at 4:57 PM, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is there a good definition of the term "policy ideas"?
>
> No, but you already knew that.


Yes, I did. But you still wrote it.


> Most specifications of policy ever created in the IETF have been
> dissatisfying to some people for various (good) reasons. That's one of the
> reasons why the spec in draft-sah-resolver-information allow anyone to
> create their own temporary specs before standardization.
>

So, the spec allows anyone to create whatever they want? Why would that be
called a standard? Isn't that just writing code?

I might be missing something, but this doesn't seem to make sense.

thanks,
Rob



>
> --Paul Hoffman