Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8552 (7064)

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Mon, 08 August 2022 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F2EC157B37 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 14:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v_nNhA77Qe2K for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 14:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80806C14CF0F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 14:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 61621 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2022 21:29:13 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=f0b3.62f18029.k2208; bh=n4iSl8mg7MX2PSOJskZI5KmczQyx6+voCk+LVeN7nv0=; b=QkTfO46Se2koYS2ftEdMpgexvELQejr3PCv9IyR2PcBCrH1T22C2zRvWlnWusK6gXlfekNnEAdI+zKq3HCyugcK/RQNr9cP2SpS1OXKUyWzYVYvnuT7W2xDvw8LNY/t4opdqI9NMfVgZ4+YgPI3GcXpJ2RxdJMP1GWYJfLdG6rVDfRqi86oTlinVQLCnDkqC/1+cZ0f2NnRriZgphy/u0K6be32Pvcd4A10ijHqhBfJEIs+S2Culpbudiru28Pk16UnlRG+nyX1W83alU9quFRqgB5FK03IP4j0xjieR5XZbQg97gb0KgGGyoDF82Qi767nwQA5en5rIUqQvS37AjA==
Received: from ary.local ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 08 Aug 2022 21:29:13 -0000
Received: by ary.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id CAE6D474E90B; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 17:29:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A41474E8ED; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 17:29:11 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 17:29:11 -0400
Message-ID: <933d5240-c419-0a39-7d19-28972f8edd6f@iecc.com>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch, dnsop@ietf.org
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.local
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iKuapuazWXAgyBuKt7Hrit93XyDUtWf8+AjRY9bJZmuOA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20220802150413.975B589128@rfcpa.amsl.com> <5bc43fbf-d117-2cad-60cd-7f227f6f682a@bbiw.net> <88087606-8579-9780-628a-f1b40918e68d@iecc.com> <CAHw9_iKuapuazWXAgyBuKt7Hrit93XyDUtWf8+AjRY9bJZmuOA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ASYporbCLPAfYqahQOlvyQVHuqE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8552 (7064)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 21:29:19 -0000

> So, just to be clear, I'm approving all of these errata, yes?

That's what I'd do.

>
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 6:38 PM, John R. Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 3 Aug 2022, Dave Crocker wrote:
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> | URI | _acct | [RFC6118] |
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> | URI | _acct | [RFC7566] |
>>
>> In Spring, 2018 and again in Fall, 2018, there was some focused discussion
>> (see:  dnsop) about _acct, and related strings, and which citation to use
>> for the enum-related values.  The choice bounced around, as I've cited.
>> This includes having what is now being deemed the 'correct' choice in
>> -14...
>>
>> Note that none of the cited documents refers to the exact string "_acct".
>> So there is a derivation process that seems to be unclear. I believe the
>> attrleaf RFC contains no pedagogy about this, but it probably should.
>>
>> I remember the rather long discussions about the possible collisions in
>> URI names between transport and enumservice names, and again about whose
>> job it is to keep registries in sync. Bu in this case we made a clerical
>> mistake, and missed the important detail that after the enumservices update
>> in RFC 6118, some of the types were added in later RFCs.
>>
>> Having looked at all of Bernie's errata, I don't think any of them present
>> subtle errors. There was an eye-glazing list of entries in that document
>> and we unsurprisingly missed a few details.
>>
>> Regards,
>> John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
>> Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.
>> https://jl.ly
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>>
>

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly