IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8552 (7064)

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Wed, 03 August 2022 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22570C14792A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 15:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sy2C1rjghBk7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 15:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A29EC159484 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 15:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 9117 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2022 22:38:03 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=2396.62eaf8cb.k2208; bh=7lEAkU50G1ZlIwAK2v4ERvg40pwwPXD3OHKb88B+X40=; b=RrMm1TiZJjNHNxjVM9zssXBff80TmNQaNbrMhU8W0dLSZA9GZ+5PaIHf1DRbDqZtSj6fLYUAXmsiSk5eZzs0Z44Yzxao7Vrh8040msbBKY3ew7G2GHCma1T2okBhS+VVuTQ+fL4vo8RY4Lo9pWcHKTqyIOi9QcoiYAUhdJZQHLD4vTnOcrGsGrjkTOcTY0h5JA+o1bVPHWhL6yTZSxjtsV1DVRmUKEF/Bx4FDlPV4TXrCdG75gNxA9Bf7mQ9AyYfNrueo1eCo2IBWlgyOeiK0NipsXUhHao/oN0zKTLBMDKdGPbenT7MVvpntUn3p6UXD4qZtp+tZS3kICs+R8ZIjA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 03 Aug 2022 22:38:02 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 509DD470F80C; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 18:38:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108D1470F7EE; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 18:38:02 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 18:38:02 -0400
Message-ID: <88087606-8579-9780-628a-f1b40918e68d@iecc.com>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch, dnsop@ietf.org
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
In-Reply-To: <5bc43fbf-d117-2cad-60cd-7f227f6f682a@bbiw.net>
References: <20220802150413.975B589128@rfcpa.amsl.com> <5bc43fbf-d117-2cad-60cd-7f227f6f682a@bbiw.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/NSIGiw2d3egS-nHpA9MAueFbzjI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8552 (7064)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 22:39:00 -0000

On Wed, 3 Aug 2022, Dave Crocker wrote:
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>>   | URI        | _acct                 | [RFC6118]     |
>> 
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>>   | URI        | _acct                 | [RFC7566]     |

> In Spring, 2018 and again in Fall, 2018, there was some focused discussion 
> (see:  dnsop) about _acct, and related strings, and which citation to use for 
> the enum-related values.  The choice bounced around, as I've cited.  This 
> includes having what is now being deemed the 'correct' choice in -14...
>
> Note that none of the cited documents refers to the exact string "_acct".  So 
> there is a derivation process that seems to be unclear. I believe the 
> attrleaf RFC contains no pedagogy about this, but it probably should.

I remember the rather long discussions about the possible collisions in 
URI names between transport and enumservice names, and again about whose 
job it is to keep registries in sync.  Bu in this case we made a clerical 
mistake, and missed the important detail that after the enumservices 
update in RFC 6118, some of the types were added in later RFCs.

Having looked at all of Bernie's errata, I don't think any of them present 
subtle errors.  There was an eye-glazing list of entries in that document 
and we unsurprisingly missed a few details.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email