Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master"
Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Mon, 04 December 2017 12:08 UTC
Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B4B1273B1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 04:08:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ggrG_mUMWL5W for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 04:08:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB142126FDC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 04:08:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:47885) by ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.136]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1eLpXV-000Oxp-0c (Exim 4.89) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:08:01 +0000
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:08:01 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <D5298F95-7B09-4C2F-8E05-0472ED25FC6B@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1712041204560.22895@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20171123.121943.1115399549648860645.he@uninett.no> <34F896BC-B044-4E46-AC60-8562A8BE782F@hopcount.ca> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1711231740240.4416@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <5562271920774233970@unknownmsgid> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1711271315380.32058@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <D5298F95-7B09-4C2F-8E05-0472ED25FC6B@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/BPdOlU2xTL01Y0hacZpfkm7cCrc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:08:07 -0000
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote: > On 27 Nov 2017, at 5:22, Tony Finch wrote: > > > > A primary master is wrt a zone not a server - a zone's primary master is > > a server that's authoritative for a zone and which does not get the zone > > contents via axfr/ixfr, but instead from a master file and/or UPDATE (or > > a non-standard mechanism such as directly from a database). > > That sounds correct. It also sounds quite different than what is defined > in RFC 1996 and RFC 2136. How is this for new wording? Primary Master master server at the root of the zone transfer dependency graph. That's exactly the same meaning as what I wrote above. > The idea of a primary master is only used in <xref target="RFC1996"/> and > <xref target="RFC2136"/>, and is considered archaic in other > parts of the DNS. Can you please provide citations to show that it's considered archaic? > A modern interpretation of the term "primary master" is a server that is > both authoritative for a zone and that gets its updates to the zone from > configuration (such as a master file) or from UPDATE transactions. How is that different to what I wrote? Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode Shannon: South 3 or 4, increasing 5 or 6. Moderate or rough. Drizzle. Moderate or poor.
- [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Havard Eidnes
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Havard Eidnes
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" P Vix
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology: "primary master" Paul Hoffman