IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-trust-history - discussion

Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> Tue, 14 September 2010 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18883A6AE3 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.222
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.222 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.377, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MltjwB4qBsOn for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stora.ogud.com (stora.ogud.com [66.92.146.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5953A6ACD for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Work-Laptop-2.local (gatt.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.6]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8EIO8Il097258; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:24:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz)
Received: from [10.31.200.147] by Work-Laptop-2.local (PGP Universal service); Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:24:14 -0400
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Work-Laptop-2.local on Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:24:14 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a06240803c8b56d295743@[10.31.200.147]>
In-Reply-To: <2BFBD0CC-95E7-4F08-B3AD-6B439F3AAD7B@hopcount.ca>
References: <569C36E4-4F05-41B2-B0B8-A4B8228F13C9@googlemail.com> <4C8E36ED.70201@nlnetlabs.nl> <2BFBD0CC-95E7-4F08-B3AD-6B439F3AAD7B@hopcount.ca>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:22:19 -0400
To: dnsop@ietf.org
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.20.30.4
Cc: ed.lewis@neustar.biz
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-trust-history - discussion
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:23:52 -0000

At 13:17 -0400 9/14/10, Joe Abley wrote:

>As I've mentioned before, the problem I have with trust-history is that
>it involves using old keys to make trust decisions about new keys. It
>is difficult to believe in the general case that old keys are entirely
>trustworthy. Presumably keys are rolled for a reason.

Double ditto.  (The "I've mentioned before" part as well as "old keys 
to make trust decisions about new keys.")

I discourage anyone caching any information that appears in any of my 
managed zones for longer than it's TTL.
-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis
NeuStar                    You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468

Spouses, like Internet protocols, lack necessary troubleshooting tools. Sigh.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email