IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-trust-history - discussion

Stephen Morris <sa.morris7@googlemail.com> Fri, 10 September 2010 11:24 UTC

Return-Path: <sa.morris7@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5E33A6A31 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1LtfumNOpklJ for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED71C3A69A2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwb34 with SMTP id 34so243543wwb.13 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version :x-mailer; bh=j/efpZMAWyse3O42RiD2LRAkAN1Q0px2xWc6RHCJZ9Y=; b=pQRWSGjKBt1RuOffl2K+tDeCFOevfVGeI1aGvVoUXBmpNcDIEI2YlXcH++QIyMWTXn h0xRjNXID+Qn9HF2MLS9XYEeAdULDXccziYoc2cCP8eBlDC4CjfCUSI8roEpxxkx9rkC dUOLt21hw3auyGOc3Q78WYI49e6m5V/F4K0Hk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; b=ljaJAzSu/e0fJIKG1A1BoRl4Nr1SAwpfUV2nDEsGNp5s+GiiMm3E5/xgkk53xaOf22 FFaSueVGFhOwViLcW4AHLeU7HAQB3x+JOthAaE8/VomFIwIJxIOd5lHUNgeunn3a/glT Oi5DEDZMm52NKTddOF2WeosEc3oijgVA3KzsU=
Received: by 10.227.127.194 with SMTP id h2mr900625wbs.74.1284117878979; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([217.155.47.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e31sm2128860wbe.17.2010.09.10.04.24.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stephen Morris <sa.morris7@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:24:35 +0100
Message-Id: <569C36E4-4F05-41B2-B0B8-A4B8228F13C9@googlemail.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Subject: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-trust-history - discussion
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:24:14 -0000

Colleagues

Although draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-trust-history (the DNSSEC Trust Anchor History Service) is a working group item and the editor has received a number of private comments on it, there has actually been relatively little discussion of the draft on the list, either pre- or post-adoption. If the draft is to go forward, it must represent the consensus of the working group.  To show that, we need people to comment on it and to support it.

So, to gauge feeling and to trigger discussion, could the chairs please have your views on the following issues: 

1. Is the situation addressed by the draft - that of a validator that has been offline or that has missed an (emergency) rollover needing to reconfigure itself - a problem that needs to be solved?

2. If the answer to (1) is yes, is the idea of using DNS the best way to do it?

Thanks,

Stephen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email