Re: [DNSOP] Cache utilization review and suggestion for EDNS client-subnet

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Tue, 02 February 2016 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC1D1B2FEA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 11:31:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tx6XbdYp8Rto for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 11:31:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x233.google.com (mail-io0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 400121B2FE9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 11:31:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x233.google.com with SMTP id d63so29363943ioj.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 11:31:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Jgr45hKStgluy0k4SJHZ1djD0HxMWnrMSWqeyh7XCj8=; b=I5mOtBJ88KgAs1pxP2e1It/8fSA0K7zhusw8xNKtE7asjREGjOzELevnsZX+AjyajH jaSUjpdHETYsauKNrw6KXw33Md0ewUt0YBttf+O0LfT0EvP8WoIwBCfM/j2TUL+RNVVk +425g1ljOK9jrz3zprp1kXIjVf5GiFrRtan9IZ+QbmQFSiaEr2qS0br9fJPwdK/eQy2H 4G7wWNn6LWyUw9PLAPFXI6oaMTXI9owwr0Ze4jQ8aEavw1BrURYTVuz8RDW/92bSAKEW jNPP0Pzpqbwoy+JurkCIgxb48penKzTYFWBZlTH+l1sGBR+YxlD4whLApUK/Y3cDwRXV 7bVw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Jgr45hKStgluy0k4SJHZ1djD0HxMWnrMSWqeyh7XCj8=; b=GM5oy3iTjGHRP7kj4rN8BlB04FJL49JHnXizP4xAEE09AwfoWDY7BZpsfdVHfav8BL LqpGn10xAXBxtkAborCoRKTXhlWtUcjDKX3ESYTXy/YvaP8RVdCn/V0R+iF7hEfCdTNB MjyTTp9iyCTjTWXU/mGICXzRjSIHxlsPixXhqJWaETdEie8d2aIJKRQezT+Ck4rCfP4o e6uEtNcIYSF9hEWPAcE6UibL+QiwCVvCGKtiTnKpirQoXbFxS/36vj9B25VP7xhUK3CB LXFjFYP4wD4JLQrE42f6CIy7r/P9kIIEF2CFAKxjjuZosHX/sUQlHuMnuTKBxD0X3lPP LmNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQm14EReZdSKXV920ku041tvyH2YjtDsksfSCVi5J6Ir8RCSkVDo/BUyE/F96vDAXKRHJkynQT+ocZ22A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.137.142 with SMTP id t14mr32744948ioi.172.1454441494618; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 11:31:34 -0800 (PST)
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.169.35 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 11:31:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151228022914.GA11204@jurassic.l0.malgudi.org>
References: <20151228022914.GA11204@jurassic.l0.malgudi.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 11:31:34 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: k803rH7jz7EcTK6x9T50ZCe_V5A
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqfWK-1qLJS4RLDo6vh=fJ8K9P89+NoCOdCsDc1Pm4B9kQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
To: Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/BZ7q7uDW7wgx3SMPOHVxVx1X9Zg>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Cache utilization review and suggestion for EDNS client-subnet
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:31:37 -0000

At Mon, 28 Dec 2015 07:59:14 +0530,
Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org> wrote:

> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet-06
>
> One of the main concerns while implementing EDNS client-subnet is about
> keeping the size of cache small and in check. It seems cache handling
> for EDNS client-subnet can be improved by changes to the option
> syntax. While the draft may be describing an existing scheme used in
> some existing implementations, it needs changes before this draft goes
> any further, otherwise it would lead to more duplication in the cache
> than necessary.

I have to admit I've not closely looked at all of the text, but I have
a couple of high level comments:

- Whether you like it or not, any protocol change will be out of scope
  of this particular draft (although the result of IETF last call and
  IESG decision might change that) - (in my understanding) that's the
  decision the wg made quite a long time ago.  If you want to
  introduce any final change, that will have to be something that
  doesn't involve a protocol change.
- From a quick read, the concern you raised seems to be related to the
  case where more and less-specific prefixes are to be configured at
  the ECS-supporting authoritative server.  In my understanding that
  was actually one of the unclear points, but the wg decided to defer
  any detailed discussions to a currently-imaginary successor of this
  document.  You should be able to find some related discussions in
  the dnsop list archive.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya