Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 29 February 2016 15:54 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC9A1B34D5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:54:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.294
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.294 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VobH3dpBgT-X for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:54:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07EC51B34CD for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:54:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3qDR442gcJzJvY; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 16:54:44 +0100 (CET)
X-OPENPGPKEY: Message passed unmodified
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vqTMzSEDE0ja; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 16:54:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 16:54:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 124BD606625C; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:54:42 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 bofh.nohats.ca 124BD606625C
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111C8DA530; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:54:42 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:54:42 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3713017b-cbe6-f4fc-c045-074e0f684952@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1602291046140.15752@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <3713017b-cbe6-f4fc-c045-074e0f684952@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/BngLcQ38L1r_VByZAib5zZaT9BM>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:54:48 -0000
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Tim Wicinski wrote: > There was some good discussion around this draft when it first appeared, and > the initial idea by the author was to run this through the Apps area working > group. The chairs feel it make more sense to run this through DNSOP and we > urged the author to allow us the chance to give the working group a try > before giving up. > > *Note: This draft will create an IANA registry for "underscored names". Now > 10 years ago, even I would of blanched at such a thought. But there seems to > have come a time where it makes sense to document the > morass of these labels and offers some guidance. The discussion seemed to > bear this out. I don't like it but it seems we should have one. > This starts a Call for Adoption for "DNS Scoped Data Through '_Underscore' > Attribute Leaves" > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf/ So I'm in favor of adopting this document. Some comments so far: Normally we try to leave "private use" ranges in registries for people to experiment on. It would be good to have that here as well, or else we won't be able to differentiate experimentation from standarization. I suggest reserving the double underscore space (__*) for private use (provided this isn't already in wide use) The document should probably explain the RRtype listed in the registry and interaction/allowance with CNAME/DNAME. Are there any known already existing conflicts where two protocols use the same underscore entry. If so, how do we resolve that issue? What are the requirements for entry into this registry. I would not want to see a rush of people registering vanity names for pet projects, taking away all the sensible one word entries. I see _mail is available :) Paul
- [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attr… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-… John Levine
- [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was Re:… Dave Crocker
- [DNSOP] comments ( was Re: Call for Adoption: dra… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] comments ( was Re: Call for Adoption:… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-… joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] comments ( was Re: Call for Adoption:… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-relate… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-relate… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-relate… Jared Mauch
- Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-relate… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-relate… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Phillip Hallam-Baker