IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-00.txt

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Sat, 25 August 2018 02:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740F3130DE9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 19:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZE2toVQre5Ey for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 19:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x229.google.com (mail-io0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3123130DFB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 19:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x229.google.com with SMTP id q4-v6so8652413iob.8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 19:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=O8g4R99bw70oopLXURb3dH4F4NWmwBfli76iFlnAThg=; b=OQEvNMWqqj/oOFdzUdNrTDStB886VF/j1tusxGxaWd4TL40TGhxj9eTGDJAx18gUdF nLUxAAwy7W+kDkPK4RoA9K7HMybYikM5wX1QRA6sQLTIN0UPnMUpo1PmSpkOMEF+dfp3 5jkVjQnnOORCOKXFGAjwK6886kPmtDbD4kmwhbfc0/uv1lsDaL9CEk32y3fSnGz0BsnO qVRUeeKlRa812Ld51eEFlt7AI4TaJlCghjpbVU3cqCISF1zeywUgahPGCOF2rjqYS2dM cvIpD7nWDolPDp1PTp2UA/DVKISiPntvW+pVu6d77MeQWEno3zX6fuC7sEhsp6cXihWQ x7Ug==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=O8g4R99bw70oopLXURb3dH4F4NWmwBfli76iFlnAThg=; b=pAowiqWCaBYJOxMGXYtgXmPHuqP/fWwlv+OVgVpDzoBmBZ5Mb+RJs0tvqHel7c7JDl g74dbeJveJkfcFrqGhezkGiVDX70B1CDm+dRB+VRaqyrAtg/XCAHY2af0UsL0eh+nrZ+ mMGYjEaChMb1fStCJ0X29aYdrBy1EyqYXMKjnnLGKV8EMQN7NIHJJ/XP6Ep2IpFXIeSQ szbCok5yW+UcrZP3hNqnGAYWHqEdFFER3VeZzizHvY3KJBVOk2TEwNy9SABsj/V0Qbtc mZRhlqyp1i1qbKSEsvHPvfzz5ECPo1DKMB7R9o/rAosrUB5HsHbB7LV85mViXkvJI3+B 2KuQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DIHuMvPLVKZ6KtQdLnQgjSPAzXx+p6PtEqt47d2hEFVOndQcNJ XPQlXNGEWYtYjEVX2zK4DMdeSyz3kcIHSUcDLo/Tbq81
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYyGa5LJ9EBLD3GGY4M+m77FIqorD3ZHhZstsVu02ee4h6A2ycxsD6Dy1mBegiwmKmNAkIATqcLI+BMGUzSx1w=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:4c5:: with SMTP id 188-v6mr3443634ioe.32.1535165603886; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 19:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <153507165910.12116.7113196606839876181.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <AFB90F6F-5D99-4403-AAB6-1123727973E6@bangj.com> <5B7F5E07.5080100@redbarn.org> <7F91FFF7-71C3-4F8E-82CD-266B170983E0@bangj.com> <C0EE2719-B662-4231-AF51-D3B98B00AD0D@fugue.com> <6D607922-393D-4549-AAFA-49279C260CA4@bangj.com> <3C6100BD-62D6-41ED-B7BF-679F0D4E4113@fugue.com> <5063A32B-4877-4860-BA73-CCB068AB7FCB@bangj.com> <CAPt1N1=tXZNgT6ygAaLFfOMze7hbGZ6q_eN1C3iEo9ryBNcyLg@mail.gmail.com> <98EF2CAC-7C13-4E68-8D2B-EC0659EA9646@bangj.com> <CAPt1N1kFNY4=CUMsTvXmeRREeLAkY8xpBdw4vPDxujgke6QT8A@mail.gmail.com> <963460AA-14BB-44AA-87CA-7F09A707DB5D@bangj.com> <47AE41F8-9F5F-4CC8-B4F0-7E8191011E99@bangj.com> <F4335D3A-0241-437F-A428-8EA95F0A1C18@fugue.com> <56E8B2A6-7B65-4D25-B102-9EFA7E2CBE7B@bangj.com> <86D465A4-F390-4370-83EC-0E72FBE115BE@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <86D465A4-F390-4370-83EC-0E72FBE115BE@isc.org>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 22:53:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=xy+JAtgvvF_+9LiTiefbpTy_Vd0b8gswozA1K1C57Nw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007dd18c0574399873"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/CLIn2AV3e6b0BwnytAVnnQLHHZU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2018 02:53:28 -0000

When would that happen?

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:52 PM Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:

> Registering slaac derived addresses in the DNS.  These are tied to prefix
> lifetimes.
>
>
> --
> Mark Andrews
>
> On 25 Aug 2018, at 05:02, Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Aug 24, 2018, at 2:59 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 24, 2018, at 2:43 PM, Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> wrote:
>
> It seems odd to take the position that the authoritative server shouldn’t
> need to clean up stale entries because it assumes the client will do it for
> you. I can’t imagine you taking this position under any other scenario.
>
>
> The issue here is that this is a pretty major change to the DNS.   If we
> really want something this heavy, we should have a good reason for wanting
> it.   That's all.
>
> The idea that some unnamed DHCP server somewhere doesn't do the right
> thing with cleaning up stale entries doesn't seem like a good enough
> reason, particularly given that the DHCID record tags the thing as having
> been added by the DHCP server, and considering that there are several open
> source implementations that do automatically delete records when the lease
> expires.
>
> I think it might make sense to just wait on this.  I agree that it's an
> interesting idea for completeness, but we don't have enough operational
> experience yet to know whether we have a problem worth solving.   With
> respect to the DHCP use case, I'm certain we don't.
>
> The good news is that if we do need this, you've done a design, and we
> also have Paul's design to look at.   So if operational experience a few
> years down the road shows us that we have a gap here, we can move on it
> pretty easily. I just don't see any reason to rush into it.
>
>
> Ok, great. Hopefully others have some use cases they can share. In the
> mean time, back to learning Rust…
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email