IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] unrelated name server name recommendation

Kazunori Fujiwara <fujiwara@jprs.co.jp> Mon, 04 March 2024 04:34 UTC

Return-Path: <fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEBBC14F68B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 20:34:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jprs.co.jp
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PbmhxNvBIIqw for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 20:34:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from off-send41.osa.jprs.co.jp (off-send41.osa.jprs.co.jp [IPv6:2001:218:3001:17::50]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1267EC14F68A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 20:34:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from off-sendsmg31.osa.jprs.co.jp (off-sendsmg31.osa.jprs.co.jp [172.23.8.161]) by off-send41.osa.jprs.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B0A40ABA7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:34:03 +0900 (JST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jprs.co.jp; s=373623; t=1709526843; bh=xZg9PVA6/RVit3fJmLHGzcN1FOBUwYvKplUtn+AliHo=; h=Date:To:Subject:From; b=JAyi8u4YkQqnA6SkuPrXh3NDbwK7q/lzO5nvW+k7AG/kDAGdeXikVShhIpFPwcaQL IscnuwWl3aokC+1ez7BCdpENRRmJCyNyeALus4828gPPUgxv+cTetPXqp8auwxo0h1 8PKewHW8XmOl2wJh5FKyz/y4SCxPw6AMCLzABg/OKTwxa+5mffv4x/ef5CLouw00RF LnWEmz9yDfYd6jnHZDqSody+pb74qklnbhWZs7V6OA5RYH7KVkJP7AjSwovQmXE80t bPqbOX3VZ2PGRdAwvHYos9hLxCdzO6oUlGfqxhPRvYO9xzIDj9d6m6nqNd8TEMUH6V kr0vESVpgkILw==
Received: from off-sendsmg31.osa.jprs.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss91 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69294602365D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:34:02 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (off-cpu08.osa.jprs.co.jp [172.23.4.18]) by off-sendsmg31.osa.jprs.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545596024076 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:34:02 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 13:34:02 +0900
Message-Id: <20240304.133402.1564724475540797830.fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
From: Kazunori Fujiwara <fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 24.5.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-9.1.0.1373-9.0.0.1002-28230.005
X-TM-AS-Result: No-0.989-5.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No-0.989-5.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSS-9.1.0.1373-9.0.1002-28230.005
X-TMASE-Result: 10-0.988900-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: R/Cd05nu1VtCXIGdsOwlUh5+URxv1WlBIfZjRfGTydg1a43ksVK2hRej jpE4hp173cE6DYTDQbOQ7qdxD/QcLZN/i/+M0xRDqdwbW9Wx9tDv9JJ5souqzJsoi2XrUn/JyeM tMD9QOgBj9cVL65YctcgGeSDYyWKZZz0AAGWYgqKM1Gu9aimtieTCMddcL/gjxlblqLlYqXLlVF EJOlvpByZR9TupP2FP7Ol+VZcQ4Rn0PYGuFnEh7MHtS5IdnFUbVtpP5CWFqYK56xnZFrQDyxZ+L +sRzme/tG5oVdakvRUSpIg7wPlSiws1Fla0NdCraFJvw78P8LapWnNFnz0QGGEoVHihj+TK
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DqE9V20AJ4pTQpvUtaatEpkCkT4>
Subject: [DNSOP] unrelated name server name recommendation
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 04:34:13 -0000

dnsop WG,

"unrelated" (or, previosly called as out-of-bailiwick) name server names are
necessary for DNS hosting providers.

However, it increases name resolution costs.
Furthermore, it makes it easy to make mistakes like cyclic dependencies.

So, I would like to make some recommendations on "unrelated" name server names.

I submitted "draft-fujiwara-dnsop-unrelated-name-server-00" as a first step.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fujiwara-dnsop-unrelated-name-server/

I prposed that
  the domain names that host the name server names MUST be resolvable by
  delegations using one or more in-domain name server names.

I'm not able to write well, I'm looking for good text.

Let's improve the current DNS before DELEG RR.

--
Kazunori Fujiwara, JPRS <fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email