IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops-03.txt

"William F. Maton Sotomayor" <wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca> Fri, 09 October 2009 04:58 UTC

Return-Path: <wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C902128C0D9 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 21:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MNmDrB-C5pSQ for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 21:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca [132.246.127.10]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFBA3A67C2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 21:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n98HGqYl001912 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Oct 2009 13:16:57 -0400
Received: from localhost (wmaton@localhost) by ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n98HGqju001909; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 13:16:52 -0400
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:16:52 -0400
From: "William F. Maton Sotomayor" <wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <FA3F9A93-EAF3-4142-8A33-BA7E72F888BE@hopcount.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0910081310440.22459@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
References: <20091006013001.BAFCE28C174@core3.amsl.com> <4ACE0FA0.90603@chaz6.com> <FA3F9A93-EAF3-4142-8A33-BA7E72F888BE@hopcount.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, Chris Hills <chaz@chaz6.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 04:58:06 -0000

On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Joe Abley wrote:

>> Should this be extended to include RFC4193 unique local ipv6 unicast
>> addresses (i.e. [cd].f.ip6.arpa.)?
>
> I seem to remember having that discussion a long time ago, maybe in concert 
> with discussion of marka's local-zones draft.

It was the Prague IETF in March 2007.  Meeting notes posted here:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg05449.html

> I believe the consensus at the time was that we didn't have a good mechanism 
> for adding delegations to as112 servers.

Right.  That's going way back before when there were some muttering about 
having a third document cover an add/drop mechanism for zones to be dealt 
with.  It was at that point that both the third document idea was dropped.

> If this is something that the wg as a whole has started to think is worth 
> working on, I could donate some cycles.

+1

wfms

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email