Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops-03.txt

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Thu, 08 October 2009 22:22 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13853A6976 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 15:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.474
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.474 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.125, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hrMF4-YdtCHn for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 15:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30BF3A6960 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 15:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (drugs.dv.isc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:820:214:22ff:fed9:fbdc]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "drugs.dv.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (not verified)) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37840E6026; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 22:23:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n98MNkoC006575; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 09:23:48 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org)
Message-Id: <200910082223.n98MNkoC006575@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20091006013001.BAFCE28C174@core3.amsl.com> <4ACE0FA0.90603@chaz6.com> <FA3F9A93-EAF3-4142-8A33-BA7E72F888BE@hopcount.ca>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:44:34 BST." <FA3F9A93-EAF3-4142-8A33-BA7E72F888BE@hopcount.ca>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:23:46 +1100
Sender: marka@isc.org
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, Chris Hills <chaz@chaz6.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:22:13 -0000

In message <FA3F9A93-EAF3-4142-8A33-BA7E72F888BE@hopcount.ca>, Joe Abley writes
:
> 
> On 2009-10-08, at 17:13, Chris Hills wrote:
> 
> > On 06/10/09 03:30, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> >> Many sites connected to the Internet make use of IPv4 addresses which
> >> are not globally unique.  Examples are the addresses designated in
> >> RFC1918 for private use within individual sites.
> >
> > Should this be extended to include RFC4193 unique local ipv6 unicast
> > addresses (i.e. [cd].f.ip6.arpa.)?
> 
> I seem to remember having that discussion a long time ago, maybe in  
> concert with discussion of marka's local-zones draft.

And for D.F.IP6.ARPA we already have a RFC which recommends that
nameservers automatically answer for this zone so it is not waiting
for the local-zones draft.

For C.F.IP6.ARPA that can wait until we decide what is actually to
be done in that space.  It's reserved but not in use.

If the f.ip6.arpa server operators see excessive amounts of queries
for these zone then we should look at as112 techniques otherwise I
would just leave it to the built in empty zones to absorb the traffic.

Mark

; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1 <<>> soa d.f.ip6.arpa
;; global options:  printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 20190
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;d.f.ip6.arpa.			IN	SOA

;; ANSWER SECTION:
d.f.ip6.arpa.		86400	IN	SOA	d.f.ip6.arpa. . 0 28800 7200 604800 86400

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
d.f.ip6.arpa.		0	IN	NS	d.f.ip6.arpa.

;; Query time: 0 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Fri Oct  9 09:08:05 2009
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 79

 
> I believe the consensus at the time was that we didn't have a good  
> mechanism for adding delegations to as112 servers.
> 
> If this is something that the wg as a whole has started to think is  
> worth working on, I could donate some cycles.
> 
> 
> Joe
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org