IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] fyi [Pdns-users] Please test: ALIAS/ANAME apex record in PowerDNS

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Sun, 21 September 2014 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870C11A0263 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:11:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jXJ4TAVmD2C9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com (mail-pa0-f51.google.com [209.85.220.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A3881A024C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id eu11so1529239pac.38 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-type:message-id:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to; bh=gWImtsXN2bTQk7hRVyQsAw5FLBlWd2QOAwogTljmzVk=; b=WrM3qPaphIdOWDfeagYSAibEsC+LmCcbftmpw/1d5sM556sQEQhEXLQhzVKlP2SUmw 4GkSj+gqiDB6zaMadQ2AI5xnmj4jDBNp4hS05FUbINuh9G+jhUqitv5/5Vk3+AF94TO4 clf/oocye+dusL9jC/B3EkQsERq1nBPpxANpstvp8dpasfjnpZcfCXoIWav0KsQYaSVg vfl9WUctNfTbl5nojSeCN04akTapaoMK+zRo8P6BRNam3sSE24YEsO6LRNd+sNem0l3W XgZ/cU5DtPV292bC+81gwS1BT4QihU2VaLxhCUtLsCQywcdAz14LY0jER5TAqui2c1uZ DjXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn+C4RtZhTvV4A+EPUgv4zjI2YjvLa9/n15RdpV+vsb3O3yGojNbNdfXQW+7KJVmWUavMiA
X-Received: by 10.66.141.77 with SMTP id rm13mr20318598pab.91.1411333862447; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.11] ([73.162.11.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l4sm7449360pdp.66.2014.09.21.14.11.01 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_87EB530D-38CD-4D83-9FC4-617080D6EEF6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Message-Id: <349FA254-AF50-457E-9504-A8707C5B57DB@virtualized.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:10:59 -0700
References: <20140921115222.GB16178@xs.powerdns.com> <541F1AE8.6010709@redbarn.org> <457731AF-E11F-4B1C-AC32-5E1AEE4EC5E5@gmail.com> <541F3D5A.7000205@dougbarton.us>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <541F3D5A.7000205@dougbarton.us>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/EKCWsKwFNNYlyjYAXPdWqL-rrvQ
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] fyi [Pdns-users] Please test: ALIAS/ANAME apex record in PowerDNS
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 21:11:05 -0000

On Sep 21, 2014, at 2:04 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> wrote:
> On 9/21/14 1:14 PM, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
>> This topic has come up here many times before,

And like the joke about the weather...

>> and there always seems to
>> be interest. A fielded implementation

There are at least three implementations of ‘alias mechanism for zone apex’ I’m aware of (DNS Made Easy’s ANAME, PowerDNS’s ANAME (same thing?), and CloudFlare’s “CNAME Flattening”). Not sure if they interoperable (or even if there is a need for interoperability).

>> and Paul's suggestion of an
>> interoperable spec both seem like healthy developments.
> 
> As always I stand ready to revive https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barton-clone-dns-labels-fun-profit if there is interest.

Given the end of the DNSEXT working group, perhaps there is sufficient interest to have a BOF (Bar, Beach, or otherwise) in Honolulu?

Regards,
-drc

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status