Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-01.txt

Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> Mon, 25 January 2021 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C824B3A135F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 06:23:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gKbDsdLnfy0b for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 06:23:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE5723A135E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 06:23:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imap.open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [84.81.54.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx4.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96C2E6A284; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:23:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from plato ([84.81.54.175]) by imap.open-xchange.com with ESMTPSA id M57ZI2TUDmAbQgAA3c6Kzw (envelope-from <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:23:32 +0100
Message-ID: <7f6100455aad69a70585ce111d15bfe846429ca2.camel@powerdns.com>
From: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:23:32 +0100
In-Reply-To: <19695dd556103011364a0e0f8ca250c6cead2c70.camel@powerdns.com>
References: <161156155643.2038.18221740878619339823@ietfa.amsl.com> <19695dd556103011364a0e0f8ca250c6cead2c70.camel@powerdns.com>
Organization: PowerDNS.COM B.V.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Gx_WtfLT9R4N_wW0z-ESsRF9mck>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:23:37 -0000

Hello DNSOP,

inspired by success stories from other WGs, I've written up an
implementation report on the IETF Trac wiki, at 
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dnsop/wiki/draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl

This will allow us to track implementation after document publication -
when the 'Implementation Status' from the draft is gone (we usually do
not publish it in the final RFC - and if we did, it would quickly be
outdated).

If we do this for other documents too, we can easily check how
implementation is going - and if implementation is happening at all!

Kind regards,
-- 
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/