[DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dnsop-session-signal-00.txt

Ray Bellis <ray@isc.org> Wed, 06 July 2016 22:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D7312D0E9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 15:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.327
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.327 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eoyB10qSiv1q for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 15:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:500:60::65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D84912D0C3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 15:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC7951FCAB6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 22:24:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDEC416009E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 22:24:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA38616009D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 22:24:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id h3J5ilhnBoB9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 22:24:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rays-mbp-3.local (unknown [46.227.151.81]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A0C3160042 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 22:24:08 +0000 (UTC)
References: <20160706221423.26712.42026.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@isc.org>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20160706221423.26712.42026.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <33bde57f-3160-acc3-e483-605eb13aa283@isc.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 23:24:06 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160706221423.26712.42026.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/HOBWu6Xw_UKNsvTbljzoNYvZycs>
Subject: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dnsop-session-signal-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 22:24:20 -0000

I've just submitted this draft, which resulted from discussions in
Buenos Aires related to issues with using EDNS for persistent signalling
(c.f. RFC 7828), and also from an overlap with draft-ietf-dnssd-push and
its (mis-)use of the edns-tcp-keepalive option.

The intention here is to split out session-related stateful options from
the dnssd-push draft into a more generic specification.

Please note that the question of whether to use an alternate message
format for this OpCode (as it is currently specified) or whether to
shoe-horn the options into an RR lookalike (per EDNS) is still a matter
of some debate between the authors.  With no consensus amongst us I felt
if important that the WG be able to weigh in on that debate.

Ray

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-bellis-dnsop-session-signal-00.txt

A new version of I-D, draft-bellis-dnsop-session-signal-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Ray Bellis and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-bellis-dnsop-session-signal
Revision:	00
Title:		DNS Session Signaling
Document date:	2016-07-06
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		10
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bellis-dnsop-session-signal-00.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bellis-dnsop-session-signal/
Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bellis-dnsop-session-signal-00


Abstract:
   The Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS(0)) [RFC6891] is explicitly
   defined to only have "per-message" semantics.  This document defines
   a new Session Signaling OpCode used to carry persistent "per-session"
   type-length-values (TLVs), and defines an initial set of TLVs used to
   handle feature negotiation and to manage session timeouts and
   termination.