Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-04.txt

Andrew McConachie <andrew@depht.com> Wed, 17 May 2017 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <andrew@depht.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77A2129AB7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 May 2017 10:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=depht-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GvpxSMdgWsRL for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 May 2017 10:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3B6E12EB28 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 May 2017 10:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id d127so24746282wmf.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 May 2017 10:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=depht-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=YkUe/Ch0qqAmgJs4fKrFlz8TTfXrUvLjMK9pyDHtkog=; b=JgB66chH2xWDfOdq71YAaG1eCX9yEKU49H36l5Q6tgQweNtRRYau4BnZKufxxIsePM bgJ1yqRv3/qns4hJo7eOCwZuJaVeVMj0xDSPhogR3Q1M/GYeSJcYy1YCq9GSt6+dqmm/ uSa1ev2L21VJamRvxQQUa0WFoV4pDtp/CZhVY4EYXwWxBXmsg98Mvi31rwhKFUyMA/PG BhBw+FrJBFOm8D5/5a0KOskrS1BMOHudYuNKiEcbRK5u4eLGr6C+ID32nm6ZLKXSbLmW Y98u4SxBEG6hOO4qHyddoyGHbL13egiuTi4wKv5Hlt7yH0SMSJNHY6TyMaHkaGJmvfXm LvpQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=YkUe/Ch0qqAmgJs4fKrFlz8TTfXrUvLjMK9pyDHtkog=; b=sXvAeJaTn/VSf3v3yqMZBL5ky66FRHWkyfPmpDRC7bbol8U+spbVsmDF28fErxuo+g c+uZB6Mzngcgd91sef8Un6IPqSwjfL9tcA2aHpLtk2SjxD5EYEPQSKuFSX4kRvjaHF8a sBkRIzk44KUOMa/OWXEq+gi1mYbI/C5k/enFglweDLvZFKnl1l3ldyQFRmt7D1cf9s6b opY620Yq770tsHf7xoe/GWwPnXXhdJduxQRA317H/ElKoBD/wk0H/JY3IYOIJ99gTNvI YHo3O6dUHswTOET71wyLUK8Ko6MIEu6SL5BfDV4VJCL2HMpS3YxO5uLfnlr78hk9ewYD CVXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDZJqKNKBhZ3Hf8I6wf7B4SexaOdxgoSi42Y972lZAm1aiTePkq 0ZqAWKFbWslSzd6PORQ=
X-Received: by 10.28.178.201 with SMTP id b192mr3121094wmf.127.1495043254131; Wed, 17 May 2017 10:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ANMC-3678.local ([2601:143:8003:2fd0:450a:4ea0:e221:6b41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c37sm2800840wra.16.2017.05.17.10.47.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 May 2017 10:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <149486024486.11940.15684743124758238626@ietfa.amsl.com> <385cc66e-4919-04ce-ab27-feca3537ae07@depht.com> <639B527D-7263-4726-B992-05B329C40E31@fugue.com>
From: Andrew McConachie <andrew@depht.com>
Message-ID: <4d606b44-18db-f836-8a30-e8581ce8e15c@depht.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 13:47:30 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <639B527D-7263-4726-B992-05B329C40E31@fugue.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/J5juT6zyQbjCNOKflZK3ZvnxYm4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 17:52:16 -0000


On 5/16/17 17:42, Ted Lemon wrote:
> Would the following change address your concerns?
>
> Section 4.1.1., paragraph 3:
> OLD:
>
>      o  The Internet requires a globally unique namespace
>
> NEW:
>
>      o  The Internet requires a globally unique namespace: a namespace in
>         which any given name refers to the same information (has the same
>         meaning) no matter who requests that information and no matter
>         from which specific name server they request it.
>
>
> Section 4.1.1., paragraph 4:
> OLD:
>
>      o  Private networks may operate private namespaces, but still require
>         that names in the public namespace be globally unique.
>
> NEW:
>
>      o  Private networks may operate private namespaces, with names that
>         have meanings only locally (within the private network) but still
>         require that names in the public namespace be globally unique.
>
>
> This is to the paragraphs preceding the one you commented on, but I think it does a good job of introducing the concepts used in the paragraphs you commented on, in a fairly natural way.
Yes. I think it makes clear to the reader what is _meant_ by 'meaning' 
throughout the document.

Thanks,
Andrew