Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-04.txt

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 16 May 2017 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC7512EAB0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 May 2017 14:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WhladYRyRGp4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 May 2017 14:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47BB2128AB0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 May 2017 14:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id y201so142065076qka.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 May 2017 14:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=B05iibLsV+NYKuYVJCoHZ+fB01ixEV7w5rgGI0evUxA=; b=Mag/sxxrc9VXfkG4SQBEXVY6xoybyxv4T8eH36NthLu3udqJGIXu8rSmfFcqjDenSS 23KiO++qvD7Eiorx2gxh0hzZ9c7j96Zfg+WzO/pvL1vyP1KoRnYXxbGJjzGlPRynzyGQ DfQ2o53uBms2hCr2aGRID6/szvC/N7Zdi9XGIEWwSwZn5uIP+vp+NTE+44A6++4TrEzD 7iP0xdBbcYeSCgpvumb2wKll8ytiQAG1W6ynfiulc6kNkphDcDG2c392uajI9Sgen1Yd VdDeLoCtkq9gPodDZIlUzyfrJqUdlBj8MPb6elJZ+hoEtMZTevqfWE734K02ilPDfXhC YmHQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=B05iibLsV+NYKuYVJCoHZ+fB01ixEV7w5rgGI0evUxA=; b=kZD2hhX/4gEco6uLRCYpGzdP1bDEbU3vBcy35V3e94VICDR5M6KLf6Dxz5TVWliLZZ fIyOgKbGgo5Udft/ztA87Cn6urj7k8hmhQD21JHyRd59h8JB7qhRcklkCBJztG0tsK5w Y9p1/bUSvMPzFrLZlHNVSrjYergPzOa06dvqw9zGQ7/V4vkrZvOC8SFm8VeVNAttk33W 4r5J5dnbxiAdbEb4TK+H+7hmK45exg0a7Ofg4B6E5xS7iuxF1wAjeW48ynNmgT8kSyur z+dhgqit6yp63geJ3hLocDVVSLIIW6PfB3HdGMCqaTGIjUKJrhXYNnCzqfrgeZ5t71Du 4iWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCQGk6w/Ra3/1ofH/DTMPRYXFuyzcjsHgHLEFvj5Ww5aAsarSFz PPjpvc1YJuSr46uD
X-Received: by 10.55.154.138 with SMTP id c132mr53365qke.293.1494970935361; Tue, 16 May 2017 14:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d200sm26208qkg.50.2017.05.16.14.42.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 May 2017 14:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <385cc66e-4919-04ce-ab27-feca3537ae07@depht.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 17:42:13 -0400
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <639B527D-7263-4726-B992-05B329C40E31@fugue.com>
References: <149486024486.11940.15684743124758238626@ietfa.amsl.com> <385cc66e-4919-04ce-ab27-feca3537ae07@depht.com>
To: Andrew McConachie <andrew@depht.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/nuSJZ4z0EqowTd4bxKuMjd78N1M>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 21:47:31 -0000

Would the following change address your concerns?

Section 4.1.1., paragraph 3:
OLD:

    o  The Internet requires a globally unique namespace

NEW:

    o  The Internet requires a globally unique namespace: a namespace in
       which any given name refers to the same information (has the same
       meaning) no matter who requests that information and no matter
       from which specific name server they request it.


Section 4.1.1., paragraph 4:
OLD:

    o  Private networks may operate private namespaces, but still require
       that names in the public namespace be globally unique.

NEW:

    o  Private networks may operate private namespaces, with names that
       have meanings only locally (within the private network) but still
       require that names in the public namespace be globally unique.


This is to the paragraphs preceding the one you commented on, but I think it does a good job of introducing the concepts used in the paragraphs you commented on, in a fairly natural way.