IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption - draft-tale-dnsop-serve-stale

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Thu, 07 September 2017 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FE4132F32 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 10:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QS8hB8c8G--f for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 10:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (dawn.hardakers.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:187::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AFAE1204DA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 10:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (50-1-20-198.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.20.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B0CB2215E; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 10:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Cc: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <CADyWQ+FHDHcmq-mr0BCHS5A8yvaOQmhTjve1_DmZN6vAc=BKyA@mail.gmail.com> <20170907154234.3z2zbju2sciiy7wr@nic.fr>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 10:36:50 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20170907154234.3z2zbju2sciiy7wr@nic.fr> (Stephane Bortzmeyer's message of "Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:42:34 +0200")
Message-ID: <ybltw0emmvh.fsf@wu.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/JRouHKKCnGnuk6_fhOoTjQBmvCA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption - draft-tale-dnsop-serve-stale
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 17:36:53 -0000

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> writes:

> I'm not enthousiastic. We should focus on making the DNS
> infrastructure more reliable, not on adding something to a pile of
> already fragile protocols.

I don't believe we have any ideas how to make infrastructure more
reliable in the face of DDoS attacks.  Is your opinion then that
everyone should be using a DDoS resilient cloud provider in case they
ever get attacked?

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email