IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] /admin/ Re: draft-dickinson-dnsop-nameserver-control-00

Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE> Thu, 30 October 2008 05:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50253A68CE; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F933A68C1; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.505
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.505 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.744, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bIn0bw1lRg+7; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from office.denic.de (gw-office.denic.de [81.91.160.182]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B143A68A7; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from x27.adm.denic.de ([10.122.64.128]) by office.denic.de with esmtp id 1KvQJ0-0006r5-N2; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 06:42:50 +0100
Received: from localhost by x27.adm.denic.de with local id 1KvQH5-0006ys-BN; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 06:40:51 +0100
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 06:40:51 +0100
From: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>
To: TS Glassey <tglassey@earthlink.net>, Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Message-ID: <20081030054051.GA26376@x27.adm.denic.de>
References: <8763nbgkw9.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <024d01c93a0c$e256aec0$2000a8c0@tsg1>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <024d01c93a0c$e256aec0$2000a8c0@tsg1>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: [DNSOP] /admin/ Re: draft-dickinson-dnsop-nameserver-control-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org

Todd, Florian, All,

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 02:25:21PM -0700, TS Glassey wrote:
> No Florian - the requirement is created by the IETF's continued violation 
> of the IPR space that the patent creates period. Once people stop filing 
> infringing works with the IETF and violating my IP Rights then this matter 
> will be closed right?

I fail to see how this discussion could be appropriately continued on the
DNSOP WG's mailing list.  Please reread Rob's earlier note
<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg06818.html>
and take this off-line.

-Peter [co-chair hat on]
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email