IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP document list; request for reviewers

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 10 September 2014 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E084E1A0294; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8sJHadBL-igO; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A25561A01F9; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (142-254-17-22.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s8AM5Tpe080228 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:05:31 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 142-254-17-22.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.22] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <008101cfcd36$9d879430$d896bc90$@rozanak.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:05:29 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D939383B-F5DA-4EC3-BA38-1AF19556E547@vpnc.org>
References: <B608A9A7-0E86-4C47-A54B-1B69AE6564DC@vpnc.org> <008101cfcd36$9d879430$d896bc90$@rozanak.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/NgvEW76ges1WZ9GgwJN7Ekydl6A
Cc: Int-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP document list; request for reviewers
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:05:34 -0000

<no hat>

On Sep 10, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Hosnieh Rafiee <ietf@rozanak.com> wrote:

> Maybe now it is a good timing to raise this question that whether or not
> DNSOP WG wants to accept to work on this draft or whether wants to leave it
> to intarea. If it supposed to discuss in DNSOP then it needs to be in the
> list of working items in the links of documents. Please share your opinions.

Not in DNSOP. It is not about DNS operations; it is supposedly about privacy of DNS queries. (I say "supposedly" because, even after 11 drafts, it is still completely unclear what needs to exist before this proposal can work.) I'm not at all convinced it belongs in INTAREA either.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email