Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP document list; request for reviewers

Hi,

During Intarea session as far as I can remember (probably others can also
remember this.. the one who attended my presentation in last IETF), Suzanne
raised this question that why a draft related to DNSOP is in intarea. 

Maybe now it is a good timing to raise this question that whether or not
DNSOP WG wants to accept to work on this draft or whether wants to leave it
to intarea. If it supposed to discuss in DNSOP then it needs to be in the
list of working items in the links of documents. Please share your opinions.

In both mailinglist, there are some discussions regarding this draft and I
tried to keep the discussion on both mailinglists.

A short history of this draft.
This draft was related to DNSEXT and active since IETF 85.  It supposed to
address the last miles of internet and focuses on secure authentication and
automation of this process. During this time, several people reviewed this
draft (most reviewed was offlist ) and a few was on the mailinglist. 

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rafiee-intarea-cga-tsig/ 

Thanks,
Best,
Hosnieh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Hoffman
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 10:27 PM
> To: dnsop
> Subject: [DNSOP] The DNSOP document list; request for reviewers
> 
> Greetings. Wearing my spiffy new WG Secretary hat (which looks completely
> different from Suzanne's and Tim's hats!), I'd like folks to review the WG
> document list at:
> 
> http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/dnsop/doclist.html
> 
> I have a specific request that will hope the WG chairs: Let me know if
you're
> willing to review a document that has few or no one in the "Reviewers"
> column. This kind of commits you to read the current draft, to at least
read the
> diffs of the draft as it progresses, and to do a complete read again
during WG
> Last Call. This information helps the WG chairs know what drafts should
and
> should not be part of the WG charter.
> 
> If you want to discuss any particular draft in the WG, don't respond to
this
> message, of course. Start a new thread, hopefully with the draft name in
it. I'll
> try to track the level of discussion based on those threads.
> 
> Feel free to let me know if you have any secretary-ish questions. Any
chair-ish
> questions ("when will you move Draft X forwards", "when will the WG LC on
> Draft Y be over", "can I present Draft X at the next IETF meeting", ...)
go to the
> chairs or to the list.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop