IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] KSK rollover choices

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Thu, 01 November 2018 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A621812D4E8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 12:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UOTDtkVPgW1n for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 12:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 821531293FB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 12:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6CCD2498F; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 12:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <00E03DAE-9403-49B2-8489-6F7F35D18534@icann.org> <CAJhMdTP-bh1yeOOCS+08rAMhkgyk6yZa9tpQvZ36rR7N=RoQow@mail.gmail.com> <23511.13515.365128.519464@gro.dd.org> <23511.14092.990015.593983@gro.dd.org> <CABf5zv+1XFPWaaX1x=W5pAK7rC4HYQ2OsQ4vvoADgKaQufjmBw@mail.gmail.com> <A800B089-EC3C-4DEF-95FD-3314ACB311A5@hopcount.ca> <CABf5zvL=VJdzJybYGR6pQFpapS=A9nQuPK-+vR2T7cptRkx5AQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1810301103240.24450@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <A54BF075-89AB-4460-B0B8-15BA18C5DC18@isc.org> <E67B15B3-76EB-4857-B400-4CEAA4E46E78@rfc1035.com> <3C97B346-B042-41D3-8E32-CFE17F305DE1@isc.org> <20A6D389-C460-45B6-821D-BDDA6E8FD47E@vigilsec.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 12:14:50 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20A6D389-C460-45B6-821D-BDDA6E8FD47E@vigilsec.com> (Russ Housley's message of "Thu, 1 Nov 2018 10:37:46 -0400")
Message-ID: <yblin1gzk2d.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/O-HOq0nYSZTXC7FRXWyNOuEd298>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] KSK rollover choices
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 19:14:54 -0000

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> writes:

> It is a good time to do rfc5011-bis.  Real world experience from the
> KSK roll makes a lot os sense to me.

I think step one would be to list the aspects of it that worked well,
and the aspects that didn't.  From that we can determine the need for a
replacement and what features would be needed in order to accommodate the
aspects that didn't work well.  I do believe it worked quite well over
all, but there are elements that were lacking and may be worth doing a
bis to address.  [but we really need a upsides-and-downsides list based
on experience first in order to evaluate the need to do a bis].
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email